Laserfiche WebLink
r. ` <br />Janu?ry 259 ???? ? Page 3 <br />Department on the prol??em and expects to ;???e it? by tirn? next meeging. <br />?????rma? ?rOk??y ma?? a mot?on ?o have the) MedicaIl, Realty Inc. <br />di???????? ???????ed in comi???s 9.flutil the next P1Lanning <br />C???sion meefe??? ?f Febrnnaxy 89 b966m h????? wa? ??consled <br />by Mrm 5palding aa?? ??? ??? ??? un??mously by the Membe:rs <br />presente <br />(?) ?ol? ??ew Subdivisionm <br />?ommerrnts were a???? ? ?ol? View Su1?di???ion ?y Mra Kaxnare£f <br />?tating thait the C¢vmnittc?? ??commcynded to Mra Baaner a stree? <br />?? ???ended to 1-80 with a cuJlmd?-s?c at the end rather than <br />wi?? butl??? onto 1-80a an? ?olf View fl??? ??vised a p]l.an to <br />ir???ca?? this with a totag of 21 lotso <br />Mr. Mu?ia? ?????? ?hat fl?e a?? Mr? ????? had a ffieeting with <br />Mrm Bauer rc??la?ive to the interests of the Schoo]L ?oa?d in <br />th?? ?ar?el ?f landle Mrm ??sial furthc?? ?tated tha? subse- <br />qu??? di????sions with Mro StuxcIlx ?? the Srhodl Boa?.?°d gndaLcated <br />a?? ??? impossible fos th?? ?o make a decision at tl??t time <br />??cause of tI?eivnot bein?? ???e as to &?ow much ffioney woubd <br />1?? ????labl? on acqui??ti??? ??? rat???? tharrn book upoua the <br />sit?? ?rom the Schoc?? ?6ard° s point of :viewa they shonld 100k <br />at i? with the b'est u?? ?? ?TLiich the land can bc? pu? wi?? <br />?????? ?? ??si???tial dwelliu??? ???ause of the Commiistee° s <br />ina?????? ?? ???? ????sions for the Schooa ?oard, <br />Mrm ??sial further stated thast tF??y wer? ??t a?????aining <br />wh?ther or r??? they. werc? ch??gia?? ??ning bufi trying to de- <br />termi?? whetheL or not? this was the best use to whicIlx the <br />Aand couILd be put?? ???ting the obd plos? showed approximately <br />19 l??? ?? ?? ??? ?cr???? ???il???? ??? ???????ing to <br />Mr. Bauc??, i?????? ?f havit?g a canl-c?????c near the lower <br />threem??????? ???tion of the ???????? th?? ???????? al7L <br />the wa? ???? ?? ????, it wouubd h?? ???sible to gei? an <br />a???tiowal two lots ouf? ?f it, thus making bc????r use of <br />the lando . <br />Furth?? di????sion- was; had relati?? ?? the ?olf View Subdivi- <br />si?? ?? all Members w?,th regard tc? the poss?.ble ?ase of the <br />ex??, l?d, ?.nd i?in?t??d out by Chairman Prokasy were the <br />zeea?on;? th?? ??enev?? ? ?ui1Ld?? ?? ? ???r has ? piece of <br />left-???? land, he could go fl???oTe the Zonir?? ?oard of Appeals <br />??? ??t a g?ermit tc? ??uibc? on ig.