Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />JanuaTy 259 1966 - Page 4 <br />With reference to.Block B9 ????t'Lozns were asked of Mro Bauer as <br />?? ????? ?? ??? ?? ???? ??th, these unspecsgied landsa and Mr. Bauer <br />stated tha4? ???? ???r h?? ?????? ?? ?elb the band tto make it <br />conf¢?? ?? ???ir requirc?ment, ind????in? where the parceLs of <br />land w??? ?nd what might? ?? ?omc? with th?m in the futureo <br />Mra. Bauer statt?? fuTther that rPa?s miAo&hg matt?rialize a.n gka? <br />?ea? futu?? ??? ?ould anot c???ermine ex??tlgr wheuu ?hat ffiight be. <br />??tion was made by Mrm Musia1 that the Plar?nin,? CommissSox? <br />?????? the ???ginall presentta?ion of Golf View Su?division as <br />presented for th6* albov?-mengioned rea?ons. Furtha?? discus- <br />sion was had on? the ?easonse ?d Chairman Prokasy a1so pointed <br />out the estl??ti? ?oiaats o£ viewo <br />Mrm Kaaaareff commented on the ?easons and suggested that in ty- <br />ing the two sublots9 ???er anegota?atio?? ? they coaYd come back <br />w?th aresubdivisicrn for the one 1ot so there wou1d be no add <br />]L??s witta which t1?? ?ommission had to ?? conceraaed. <br />S?????tion was made by ?airman ??okasy that the origina1 plan <br />?? ??th?rawn by a?????entt of the paLrti?? ? namely9 the Planning <br />??mmitt??e and the devebopera Mra Musial wittrn??ew kais motion. <br />The i???ia? ?lan ?? ?olf Vi,ew Su1?division as submitted by <br />Mr. Bau?r h?? ??in.withdrawn at the developeg's request in lieu <br />of the ???mi?sion of Go]Lf View 5??di??siQn ?ev3sed PYan dated <br />Janua?? 24, 1966.. <br />Mre Mu???? ????ed''they wilb consider the revised plan as having <br />the empty ?r u?numbered b]loclk tied to Bloc? 21, and B1ock B as <br />tied t¢? Block 2. <br />MrA Musia1 made the motion th?? the Com3.???on accept the paYticu- <br />b?? ??op?sal for consideration and put it t? ?omittee and <br />Chairmat? ?????sy=seconded it; whe?eupon, aft??? ?oll ca11, the <br />motioa? pa???? ??animoansly by the Members presentm <br />(d) Oviatt m ??raixa Road Proposed Rezoningo <br />Chairma? ???kasy, , . ia? ?ommittee with mr. Spalding9 explainesl to <br />the Comm??sion that this i??olved ?? ????? ?etween Mamsners and <br />Mat??ew$ s va?ant parceb presently zoned ? ?ciafl.. The develop- <br />??? ???in?? ????? ?? parcebs and requc???ed an extension o£ zon- <br />ing £rom the 500m???? ?imit as preseangly shown on the Zoning Code <br />of the City ito t1?? ???l length of the lot, ?eing a toga1 0£ 900 <br />fec??? ???g an a?ditional 400 feet.