Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-March 8, 1966 m Page 2 <br />as corrected. <br />III O71? Business <br />(a) Sands 5??di?????n #4 <br />MrR F?rd stased th?t h? and iNix4 Eagar Y?ane in doubt a? to <br />????? the ??????k li??? ?ere tc? ?e putF T-?4?.?° o EsgaT was to hav? <br />??????? with Mr4 Kanareff so he would have ner? ???wings f?? th?? <br />???ningg ? ???tingm 11=, F?rd indicatc?d he uiad checked the rul?s <br />anc? ??gul???ons regarding tF?? ???????g Ordinances anc? found that'l. <br />t?? ???bac?k, lines s???? ?? ?? ??? sh?r?? ?n all plotss <br />Mr. ???? ??? ??t know whethe? th?y w??? ?a'Aen aw the lot line <br />or tka? ?????? ?? ??e arc o:? ??? ???e-l?? anc? ?????? the Committr?? <br />?tu????? ?his had to-caT ctxlate be£??? finding the an??er and w`??ther <br />they meet a?? ?th? ??quirementse <br />Chairma? ??oka?? ??di???ed he hac? di?cussed the matter'with <br />City Engineer Laba? ?ho said he had apgar??ed it from the eua?inec????? <br />??????oints Chaa.ar-man Proka?? ???d a l???er ????d F??ruar? ??, 1966 <br />fr? the City Engi???r indi?atfi,n? the ???ea?e a??rua,ng from Sands <br />5??aiv?? ??? ??4 a? ?eing .407 a??? ? anc? the a???imum ?????? ?? land <br />t?? ?? ??ed?? ?? ?? City from Sands 5ubd°???????s #1, 29 3 an.d 4 were <br />7.699 acresm <br />Mra Ford indicated th?? ???th?? ?onside??tion whi?? ??? ???en <br />Q??? the ?alk ?????ent, the ??? ?eing 36.97 feeta aa?? ????? ?akin,g <br />five feet off the are it 1ea??s ap???? ?mately 32 feet9 i?dic???ting <br />pos??bly there would na?? ?? enougka ??ontav? four the driveway. <br />Nirm LaPonza i?dic????? ?t woul? only take 31.95 feet to accom- <br />modate thisa Mr4 Ford a ndica?ed that altlhoangh it did not-redsn?e the <br />frontage e it red???d Iit f?r driveways going backo <br />Chai??n P?okasy ind??????? ??ca??? ?f the absence of Mrr. ?anar??f <br />at this p??ti??lar time tha? ?his ma???? should be held ua?til his <br />arrival. CouncaLlma? Mangani indicatecd that hi? comittee to?l'?e the <br />exagineer° s comp??at3on'as £inalw <br />Further discussi??? was had as tO the feas.?bi1ity of ??ilding <br />h,ouses on th??e lotsa Mr. LaPom??? ?????? ?t all depended on 1?? the <br />hou??? ?ere put thereon, <br />(b) City 7Line T???? <br />??. Fa1?ek indic???8d af??? study there csuld be fc?und a??thing