Laserfiche WebLink
M???? ?? ???? ? ???? 3 <br />wrong witih ??? ?ayua:?? ?? the plato He sta`'?eda hu?.??vaT, the e??nly <br />recommendatioan thc?y had was coa?cea?ning the cveghead easement9 its <br />`??in? ??movec? ??? the plat ua?til they cc??Ld resolve the uLn«???? <br />?round uta?lity si?uationo Mr. Fabs1? ??so inc??catc??? that in W•:.::: <br />discussioni with the peop1? ??ulvaia it_was expTessec? to them <br />that the c???eloper wuuld be interesteR? in unc????rouyd util9? ti<?? ? <br />?? ??? ot??r hand, if the C?mmi'tee fusn:.??d they could not be in- <br />stt????? ? ??? ??rh?ad ???ement cla??? couid b« adc??? ??? the plata <br />?????ers after faurther discussion i? ???? ??ou??t out to <br />Mra Fak??? ???t h? ??? misqncderitood ??? ?eaningm Upon fu:??hsT <br />c??????pion with Mra Lombardoa ?ttowney fc?? Ci?? LinU Pla?.?a hca <br />indiCcatec? ???? ??? request as pa???????? ?? ??? ??s maxeLy a <br />request ???? thc?? ?? powc?r lines fos the sulbdivision aundergronndo <br />H,e s????d that the devel???? ?OuL¢fl 1W to do it but they <br />cosbd ??? commit tn???elves because o£ th? ??gueness Of t8?? ????? <br />???ol?eda Chairman. Prokasy ix?dicated. th?? the easc?????? clause <br />indicated to allow C gEe b o to put ovc?????d linc?s ina?? ths Com- <br />mit??e w?? ??si??? ?? ?em????? this p?rticu1ar cb???? ??? alLaw <br />the possibility of aLnstabi?? underground power lines instc?ade <br />Mt. Andreano. ind?cated that it was a staandarc? ??au?? ??? <br />??????ead easemonts which Ce E e Ia had f?rnishec? him. Mr. Lambanc?o <br />abso sta?ed that the.deve????r informec? him t1?at ira the past <br />C.E.I. had goi? ?? the builder to get the easemernts to r.zn poa?r <br />l??? alon? the back,..c?? the prop???y lines. Now9 howevera they <br />are request1ng it be put on t&?? plats so as they can c?o i? ??thm <br />out having tr? ?? ?? ??? ?uilder, <br />?? the pa?st9 C.Eo16 ?ad run Intc? ??? si?????on where the <br />builder coulcd se]ll a ???pl? ?flats an? ???? th?y had ?? ???roaccfl? <br />the indivicdua1 owners. <br />Mr. ????? ????? that City Line States Subdivisi?n #3 i?? ? <br />?????oved with tk?? ?ti?ulatioun that the-utila??? ???ement be re_ <br />move¢? ?rom the print a? ?hi? timea secunded by Mda L4Ponzao Roll <br />cal]1 on themotiam9 yeas, Spabdin?, LaPomma9. FroIkasyg Ford.and <br />F??ako - Mro Fatak ffic???? ?hat the Ci?? Li?? ??at. #2 lbe approved sub- <br />je;t t? ??? ????val of the easement claus6 on the utility easementsa <br />??????ed by Mrm Ford. R?ll ?all pn the motion9 ?eas9 Spa71dinga <br />LaPonzaa P??kasyp Ford and Fabsk. <br />? <br />?