03/08/1966 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Nal.W?? ? % 1966 - Page 8 the, o}2Il l.y r?queo?'?rt t'a be ffiad(? ?f t_he was VJ) prnviy hi9 cy:tC`i51,;,ald build on the lot• Goun$:'U .L1flan 1L?anga?U `'.t!n %111@ BaTi"theI,P ?????? tha? ?? wa? hi? ???inion the buxZer? ?i pxoof :U on the ?`?ieveloper to mr??t all ??? ????ack ancc? ?uilding ",itie Tequtiq?e-mcntso ?f VLrnc? ??anning Cott???sime. in their juldgam,,:at9 fu?, ? the dr?,,k7m;l0.pe? hac? ?ot met a?? ?he, requ:???ementsa ?????? could a?? 'lf«T a blawup o:? ? paz'C;??ul?r lot to indi?ate t?,?;e d??elnper°? ???anti(c?)ns oLr? ?thall-, 71.oto couRI1ci1,man mem?ani i-nC' ?cateia. it 'o:?,v '1 tlie Mayo:fa s C-?t,c''.?fi a.;e t??1a? the ?om- it•??e inv??ti???? ????y o??-slh?apad lut9 com;?rary to his thvughtso ?? ??feren?? ?o iMr. ??alding°:? ????xks reg4rding ehe nec?;????ty of havin;? the spsl,t ?? the ???TDr,*U'1??sUaL? Codee Couan?ila?an Mang?i r??????? ?? the Ci,ty° s Zc?ning Code whaTc?- in is set ;forth all. ??? mi???? ????acks, squxre footabea anc? ?uilding size. H? indir????? th?t i? ???? ?? ?? ev???one concesuuec3 ?? halt the "parade°? ?o t?? ????? ?? ?oni?g Appc?al? ??riancc?s anc? take tk?? tizrA? and troubl? ??? chac,? ???-lot sia;eso UPOn q??st??ning frc?? Chairman F??????? ?elative to 8ugges° tions e?? ?????endatians as to how i? ??ould be c?vii??nce(i in the ?ubdiv°?sioa? ?ode, Mrm Spaldi?g i?dic?at?? that it be c???inittld ???dicat?? that t3?? ?uilc??r was to exea?pli?? on the plan ????? ??? rearmlot lin?e anc? the fros??-lin? was l??? t-han 60 per cent of ??? ?uilding code lineo Cc-Ln??ilma? ?an?ani 3,ndicated9 i? the ??????ch ??? ? ?athem mati?al one on a r??ta??ul?r l?? ?? ??e-o?timum si?e lot f?r a developer to g??? ?n a particular areaa &?? ?oulc? ???e d????????? ?rea-w3se and set????????e if he stzayed from a rec-tan,??e &,rad n0tk??g wou2,d be a?f hel? ?o him. Tne C???il?? th????? this c?;capt was not ta?wa'-P? the bens- £it ?? ????? ?ancerneda and it could not be done because of t?.?se na?;?°ure of the c???el?pment configurat1.y.ras im the Citya ?? al?o iL?- d?????? ???? ?? ??bitra°?ily saying 3,? ??? to bc? ? ????ain per- centa,?? ?f a frontagea it woulc? ?? fo??? ?? ??? ???elog??r intu a? ??ctangle. Mra 5paldi?u? cl?rified that? ?? was not his imteaa? ?? ?av-s th3?? ??? ?nly to re?ui?? ?ha? ??? ?eveloper sho? ?? ??uld builc? ?n the 1N?t anc? the sole reason fn? thi? ??? ?o pr,?vi?? some gxid?- line for futu5pe 1)oa:??? ?? ???ni?g C?? ?siona ????cilmaa? ???ani observed tt??? this rec????? ?? ???? Board of Zom?ing Appea1s for vari?s?? ??e ab(o??t in 60-fo:?t l??s and rarely 3,? 70- and 80-foot lots. Counc3,l.-man Castc?? ?oi???d out that per4xaps the ????ep? ?? ???eloping sh?ld ????e kn that pc????bly