Laserfiche WebLink
March 89 1966 ° Page `? <br />the deveboper has had a?? ???? ????? ? I_), 'So in and 1??;?? vut .8tXec??? and <br />?????qu????? ????ng ??? ??ilc?enz; eta <br />????rman Frukasy indic??tec? th?? tlhi? ?2fablsm did mat arisc? <br />???? ?????gul???shaped lotsg even ??+nu the 60-fuot excc??t <br />in cul-demsacso Ndrm spabding mmadc? t7ne mo?"4 ? on th?t t?.1?s ?c?muaaca- <br />ticii rc????ved f?? ???cil be sent `????? to' 0=a.?????? ?-rom w?,9?c?h it <br />ori?inated so that thc?? ??ul? raview ii? ?? te?? ?? ???? th?? <br />Planna??? ?omi?si? ???blems are and vohat- wcQ? scac? ttruc?.? ?xabl(,_?,Ma might <br />be ar?? ??r'naps cco?? ?? ???h ano`hlax secondec? ??? <br />?ai??an Prokasya Roll-ca1l cm, the mw?;Swon; ycas9 ??aldi..?ga ?!? w?-'?onza <br />I??????? , F?rd ?nd Fabakm <br />Committee members con4:ai?t of Mesonsa ??gar and Spaldizugo <br />A??th,?? ?????? ???ed ????h 79 1966 ;??? t1h? Clatk of Cvtunc??? <br />?ela???? ?o amendment of Orc??nance Noo 64-93e Discussice7n an??und <br />relative to the hapg?enings an the pat,,7,t: wit;? ?egard to the Pl?????? <br />??dinanceg C???ilara?? ???ani pointaZmlg cufy tE??? ? n allowins the <br />ordinance to reffi?? ?? ?t'i? (nc?t 1-taving to dc?????? un??? ? ????? <br />was issued) coubd be used as a devige to ????tall the devolopmment <br />up to si? ?ea?? ??????e all p?rmi?? ??? t"T an c?? ?n a subdivisione <br />?? ???ding the ??dinance in? ?uch a mannc?? ???? they must <br />have aYl impro-,ime-nt? wi?hi? ?? y(sars from the datck, of ????oval <br />1?? ?ouncil, i? ??ld be of b????fit ?? ???yonuo <br />CE?????? Piockasy mm????? ???? ??? Plani???? ?omissiro? ????a,?ve <br />the , rc?c-omandaticm of'Counc??? that Se«tlon 109 "??mplc?tL <br />ic? ?? ???ai? <br />lmy,i :ovements'8 of Orc?inance Noe 64-95 (PI.???ti?g Co-rdinance) R?? ????ed <br />in a????????? ???h the ??????tion by Coumcil$ sc?conded by Mro LaPonza. <br />:??ll call on the motion; yeas9 ?paldi?g,, LaP??za,, F??????y,, Foa;(d <br />anc? Fa?sk. <br />???????? ???gani inc??????? ???? ?? ??? ?f ThI? Comittee <br />was no loa???? the City . P1?ni?? ?ommittses ?? the ??sign anc? Plat- <br />ting Co-mma,tteeo <br />?? ???????? ??????? <br />(a) Mre Fabak 3.ndicated it w.?? the Cumittee c??si??? ?? ?old <br />??? ???? ????nancc? ??????? ? ???tt??? ???? ? couple of weekse <br />(ia) Chainaam Proka?y indicatec? that the ?ermit hac? ??en <br />allc????? ????lly for. ????? ?????? an-d ?????? ??s an easc????? ?????? <br />by the persor? ??o mmsthe 1??? ??at, the Cif?? ???? an ac???tior?al