Laserfiche WebLink
? 4,0 <br />tu of Y?r#4 (SlucstE?, it <br />i <br />eAWO <br />MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE PLANNING CO"IISSION <br />Mag 9, 1967 <br />8 :07 0 tcl.ock P.M. <br />? Roll Call <br />The meeting waa called to order at 8:07 by Chairman, <br />Vialter Spalding. Those present vJere: Messrs, James Prokasy, William <br />Absent were o Messrso Norman <br />Scllaeff, Wa7-ter Spalding and Jack Esgar. <br />Mia.sial, Anthony LaPonza and Thomas Fabek. Also presente J. Bruce <br />Kitchmne I,aw Director; Carl BoYm, Regional Planning Commission; Frank <br />pWest. <br />I3uttora, City Enginee??a ence Johrmann <br />pointed <br />Tn the <br />Mrm Esgar as Acting Secretary. <br />I? Reading-'and Gorrection of M3nutes <br />The followi.ng corrections were snade to the minutes of <br />?967e_ page ls ?Ie corrected to read tOI?Ir. Esgar moved to <br />Apri?. ?5, <br />dispense with the reading-:?? the minutes of April 11, 1967 and to <br />approve•theYn as submitted wiPa ehi nII(b)a??correcte d torrearli"Question <br />aeconded by Mro LaPonza,t8 ? s ? Pa e 2 VII(a)• af`?er <br />regarding location of boiler room in buildin?et° ? ' • <br />the second sentence insert A ion todaccept?theCNormandy?Apartm?nt <br />by ?v Esgar for the planning Commiss thou h the <br />?•e1,3.minar? Plans f°or cor?sideration at this ?iori?o 9 evtheen meeting. A3?es : <br />de?re1oper had not submitted them five days p <br />;,eh08ff, LaPonza, Esgar and Musial. ?o?asSPieconded bg Mr, Scheeff <br />Mo?tion was made b?' Ma°a P 5 and s <br />to approve the minutes ot' April 259 1967 as corrected. <br />yII Old Biasiriess <br />(a) New Stearna Road ' <br />Reports by Nr. Dutton and Mr. BoYim indicate that not <br />enough information had been otatained from the County and State Highway <br />pyePartnents for the Planning Commi.ssion to be able to make any recommen- <br />dations on the RTew Stearns Road Proposalm <br />Councilman John West spoke from the audience regarding <br />the wishes of residents from the Bretton Ridge SubdivHeistatedathatgthee <br />Dossibility of an I-80 Tnterchange on Stear^ns Road. <br />residents haee formed a cornmittee, considerationsbet?iven toPtheirn?equests <br />Go?ission meo'ting, and as ain comes before <br />as?d to notif`y tYiem when the question of the interchange agithe Planning Commission for considerations <br />?gene Barkhurst9 6299 omerset I'ive: rQPresenting seeen <br />, larmi <br />Cormi membQrs of the Bretton Ridge COaenttownersreinsBrettonPRi genwere ofsthen? <br />ge stated. that the present resiopinion that there would be ne ?'thatcan intercha.ngenatRBaaton Road eould <br />bougYit their houses. The? fe1 <br />be better for both them and for NorthOnearefuture toadiscussatheematterng <br />to meet taith the State Etiigineex' in the <br />A, motion was made by Iy' Prokasy, seconded by 1?Lx°. Scheaffg <br />fu.rther, <br />?'e <br />to tab1e further consideration of the Stearnesdaado fnt?e 1?o anA? g?ti I,g,°kasya <br />d Tu Y <br />, planning Commission meeting on the secon <br />-------_------ <br />?, • and Esgare <br />??--- ?h?_?f.,? --???lain?------ - ------- ----- --- _ -