My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/23/1967 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1967
>
1967 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
08/23/1967 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:47 PM
Creation date
1/31/2019 9:45:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1967
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
8/23/1967
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 3- Minutes Board of Zoning Appeals - August 23, 1967 Request is in violation of Ordinance #62-33, Section 1151.04, <br />fence no-t to exceed. 4' in height. <br />Present: Mrsa Price <br />Mrs. Price ea:plained that the fence would have a three-fold purpoae: Decorative, <br />to hide the air conditioner and to precent school children i"rom cutting through <br />the yard. Fence would be a. vertical cedar boa.rd va-riety with a maximum height <br />oF 61 ancl a minimum height of 41. She stated that she hacl talked to neighbors and <br />they have no objeetion. Mr. FeZson moved to grant a variance of 2' for 291 of <br />fence and a variance of Ii for 241 of fence. Mr. Roberts Seconded the motion. <br />Motion passed. <br />8. Appellant: Paul Suhm, 23282 07-msted Drive, Rea,ues't to erect a two car <br />detached garage lOtt too close to the pronert3T line. A IO" <br />variemce is requested. <br />Request is in violation of Orainance #62-3.3, Section 1I5I.04, <br />a garage shall be a minimum of 51 from any property line. <br />Mr. Lq.thm was not present but a review of his application showecl that contractors <br />had put a cement base in for his garage 10" too close to the property line. ThiS <br />zqas an error on their part but could create a hardship for the homeowner if a <br />variance w-as not granted. Letters were received from Mssrs. Clark, Sterling and <br />CarltOn stating that they had no objection. Mr. Byers moved to grant a variance <br />of 10", seconcled by Rober'us and passed. <br />The meeting was adjourned_ at 9c20 P.M. <br />William J. Greene, Chaira.an <br />Bally Henkle, Secretary
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.