My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/27/1968 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1968
>
1968 Planning Commission
>
06/27/1968 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:36:51 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 3:14:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1968
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/27/1968
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED, OHIO <br />? <br />` PLANNING COMMISSION <br />June 27, 1968 <br />Ro1.]. Ca1.1 <br />The meeting was cal.led tm order at 8:05 P.M. by Chairman Jack Esgar, Those present <br />were Mssrs. Jack Lsgar, Edward Byers, ilorman Musial, Kurt Richards, James Leonard. <br />Absent: Thomas Fabek. Also present: Carl Bohm and Bob 5voboda, Regional Planning <br />Commission; Mike Karnahan, Engineering Department; Sal1y Henkle,.Secreeary. <br />II. Readin.g and Correction of Minutes <br />Mr. Leonard moved ta d3.spense with the reading of the minutes of June 11, 1968 and <br />to approve as writiten. Mr. Byers seconded the motion. Ayes: Esgar, Byers, Musial, <br />1tichards 9 Leonard e <br />IzI. Ol.d Bv.siness <br />(a) Addition tio high school and adm3.n.istrative annex -- Mr. Mus3.al reported that <br />a ser3.es nf suggestions made by the City Engineer tio Lesko & Associates 3.n <br />regard to the add3.tiions and altierations to the high school had been comp].ied <br />w3:tih. He maved that the proposed plans for addition and altex°atiiotiYS to the <br />high school be appYoved; seconded by Mro Byersd Ayes: Esgar, Byers, Musial, <br />Richazds, Leonarci. Mr. Musial reported thati the adm?nistiratiiv'e anitex should <br />be referred tio as the maintiainance building and tihati the tiwd problems outi- <br />1,ined by the Citiy Engineer had been correcteda There 3.s a dra3.nagGD pLoblem <br />in the area of the practice football fie].d already but the maintainai.lce <br />buildin,g would noti compound the problem, Mro Musial moved til1at the platis <br />for the ma3.ntainance building as COrreCtGd on the specificaCiotis of Y,eslea <br />and Assdciates be approvec1. Mr. Leonarcl secnnded the moti.an. Ayes : Esgar 9 <br />Byers, Mu83.al, 1t3.chatds, Leonard. Mr. Musial made the recrsmrnendat3.an tiliat <br />a letter be senti to the Superirttiendant df School,s asleing thati cons3.deratiinn <br />be given in t11o 1969 schadl buclgeti fbr a c1raiLlage system t,o be instialled in <br />the area of the practii,ce footbal,l field in oreler to prdv'ide necessax'y <br />drainage a.n the area. <br />(b) Regidnal- _Plann3,n,g_Oommi8sionRepor- 1rizd tohni stated tihat 11e had beo-tx a8lced <br />to pr-epare alettier requesting afedezal granti for tho purchase bf Springv <br />Va1e Go1f Cautree. f?? ptesentecl copies of the lettier that had been seliti e He <br />suggested ehat ciiscttssien of the Lorain Kdad Repor.t be helcl after t11e ottier <br />bus%rceee oe the evening has lieen completede <br />(c.) MoCron.e_Suilders ° Mrb ICanateff reported that ti1»y wish to enteY into a joiftt <br />venture with Blogs6iit Lancl Go-rp6ration as a cl,uster developmenta hfr. llYnenedettu <br />stated that tiis prepdsal weuld remairi exactly as presentiecl but that til`to land <br />owiied by McCron? BtiildeYs w6u1d be incl,tided a1so 6 They a81zed 3,f the 1.8 aCres <br />of land tihat the city reqiiiree ftir- Yecreatiori cottld be in andtLier 10??tiort df <br />the ci-tye It wa.o explained by Mr. Eeggr th.at the Plannirig Cbminissian wou1d <br />warit ta cheek with the Law Direetar ta ?????taiii vjhethet or not tliis fvould be <br />legal arid alsa would want to detertriine ig there is some loC?lity in the city <br />th-at wauld be acceptableB The questi6ri a1,eo arose as tio whether money Gou1d <br />be given iri 1icu of lanclo The deve:l-op??r, wii1 subini:t a unified proposal t;o <br />be consirleret? ?e a Eluster develbpment. The propoga1 taill be kept in cominittea: <br />M.r-6 Musial9 MrA Fabc? afid Mre Leonard r,vill tiand1e,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.