08/07/1968 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONTNG .APPE.ALS - August 7, 1968 - Page 2 Mr. Kiizg explai.ned that they wish tQ erect a, basketweave fence for privacy purposes and for sepaxation at the property line. The house next door sits c3ose f,o the road (only' about 201 from the sidewalk) while their otan hpuse is set back- 701. TYie next door house is in disrepair9 has tar paper siding on an unfinished adclit'ion, etc. and has been in this condition since the Kings moved into their hame las't Oetober. Mrse King sa'zd that she has talked to the Ferme,y2es who live in the house and that they ha,ve no objections to a fence being install.ed.. A Ietter £rom Andxew Repko of 25190 Butternut Ridge stated that he ha.s no objections. Mro and Mrs. Beldirig stated tYat they do objeet to the fence and suggested that possibly shrubs or evergreens mioht serve the purpose as well. They pointsd out that the Fermoylea have only Iived in the house fvr a short tunc and that thQy felt that given enough time, the addition wQUld be compZeted. Mr. Greene stated that he would refrain from voting on the basis that he is also a neighbor and an interested party. He stated th€3.t he does not feel that a 61 fence woulcl help and suggested the pmssibility of screening the natio area only. Mr. Kixig st,eted that he woul.d be willing to cut the Iength of the fence. Mr': Forcellini moved -to grant a variance for a 61 fence extending fron the back of the garage to 2' bey'ond the back of the patio; se;conded by Mrs. Eian and passed. 4. Appellant: Robert Koeacs' 24456 Noreen Drivea Request to ereet a garage 181 from the dwelling and 21 from the side 1Qt Iine. Request is in violatiQn of Ordi.raanee #62-33, Section 1151°04, whieh requires th:?.t a detached garage be so located that no part of same shE.Il be within 20' ef any dwelling and sha.Zl be a minimum of 51 from any pro-perty Iii-iee Present: Mr. Kovacs, Mr, and Mrs. Taylar9 Councilman Vixginia Hodgins Mro Kovacs explained that there is a 151 Engineer3.rig Easement at the rear of his property which prohibits his going baek the req-uired 201 from the dwelling. By bringing the garage .forward, he must ;olace it farthur to the side in order to make the swing into the second sta.].l af the garage. He stated tha.t the garage will be roo£ed identical to the house and would be brick veneer on front to match the houseo Mr. and Mrs. Taylor stated that theg do.not object to the 181 distance =rom the dwal].i.ng but do object to the garage being built 21 from their lot Iine. It wa.s determined that it wouZd be defini•tely impossible to move the garage over the requirc;d 51 and stil1 be able to make the ssaing into the garage if it is anly I$1 frora the house. Mrs. Hodgins wi.Il check to see if there is any possible wa.y of btzilding fttrthur back and on a portion of the E?ig3neeriilg Easemento Mrs. Eian inoved to continue the case; Seconded by Mr. Forcelli.ni and passed. It was decided that the Board will hold another August ineeting on 8/21/68 and the case will be heaa°d at that t3me. 5. ADpellant: Bauer Development Compaxiy. Request to erect a, dwe7ling on SIL 1?$ 33ellevue llrive 2161, too c]:ose ta side Zot lineo Presen'te Mr. Bauer, Mr. Oring Mre.Bauer expZained that this sub Iot is on the curve oz" Be1lQVUe Drive and that the side rear of the lzouse would require a variance o:f 216". The home to be erected is their standard split Ievel model and would enha.nce the neighborhaod. Mr. Oring stated that he objected, that Mr. Bauer should not be allowed to get away witli the things he` is doing in the subdivision ?.n.d that no varia,nees should be grantede He said that one neighbor haa hot been notifiedo He.is a new homeohmer and it was,explained that the pla.t books a.re brought up to date only onee a year an.d that the property was still liasted to Pa.uer I?evelopment Companye He prov3.ded the Board with the name o£ Edward Gron of 6156 Bellevue Drive. Mr. Greene rnoved to continue the case to the next meeting9 seconded by Mr. Forcellini a.nd passede