08/07/1968 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOAR.D OF ZONING APPEALS - August 7, 1968 - Page 3 - 6. A-ppella.nt: Robert Cutler. Request to erect an Auto ????,sh ?.t 24532 Lora.in Road with a 351 setbacka - Request is in violation of Ordinance y,=`62-33' Section 1174.02 which reauires a buil.ding setback in a retail business district to be a minimum of 501. Present: Mro Cutler, Mr, 14urray' Mr. Ramsdale9 Mr. Polanski Mr. Cutler explained that the proposed Auto TTash would be a bu,ilding si.miTar to the new Danny Boy Marke-t and DairJ C)ueen across the street. Tt would be a coin opera.ted two staI.1 a.utornatic car wash. The Automotive Industry atipu].ates /+9' for a minimun turn and the hardship is in establishing a steady flow of traffic. Mrs. Eia.n stated tl-iat she feels the area would be too conge5ted. It iqas pointed out that Mx. Cutler a1.s0. own8 the adjoining lot on which his printing eompan3r is Iocated. An easement on tho printing coinpany property would enabZe the building to be set f.irthur back from the street. Mr. Greene moved to grant a 7?1 front yard variance era.bling the Auto ZeTa.sh tQ be located 1,.2?, from the ?f?o?t' lines _seconcl?eT'b?r Mr,. ForceZlin.i pn&'pass6d'.idth Mr: -Nelson voting no. 7. A.ppellant: J. Joseph Nieberding, Request to erect a dwelling on SA4 IIoodview Drive'vth a 321 rear yard. Request is ixi viola.tion of Ordinance #62-339 Section 1163.01 wlii.ch requires a 501 rear ya.rclo Present; Mr. Nieberdin.g, Mr. Ringu, Mrs. Odaka Mr. Rinyu explained that an I$e rear ya.rd variance was be3.ng requested in order to erect a..n L-shaged aplit level house with an attached garage. The attached garage would enhance the valuation by approxi-mately ?,$1500. The house wi.Il be v?l.l.ued at approxi?'nately $30,000 which is comparable or better tha.n other5 in the area. Mrso Odaka stated that she has no objection. Mr. Forcellini rioved to gra.nt a variance of 181 for the rear yard; seconded by Mr. Greene and passed. ge Appellant: George Sarkan' 4533 Carsten La.ne. Request to erect a 51`basketweave fence a.l.ong rear property Ii.ne. Request is in violation of Orali.na.nce #62-33, Section 1151.01., fence not to exceed 4' in height, Present: Mx. Sarkan. Mr. Sarkan explained that the party in the rea.r of his home have a 41 cyclone fence but that their property is 11 higher tha.ri his own. ge wa.nts to erect a 51 redwoa3.- basket- weave fence that will hide the cy¢lone fence and be even in height with it. Hxs neighbor does not objecte The rest of h3.s yard would be fenceu wi.th 41 fence in accord€nce w3.-th the code. He has a$40,000 house and does ne,t Iike the appearance of the cycZone fence. Mr. Greene nioved to grant the variance9; seconded by Mrs. Eian and passed. 9. -kppel.In.ntz John *D. Snydex, 24933 Ant7-er brive. Request tca erect agarage I110" too close to the side lot Iine. ReVest is in vi.olation of Ordinance r62-33, Sectian 1Z51.01+9 a:: gara.ge :> tha.Il: be 'a_-.minimunn of 51 from thE Iot Tine. :. Presen.t: Mrs. Snyder