Laserfiche WebLink
•B0APD OF ZORTING APPE4LS - 1I/7/68 - Page 3- <br />? wistaes to add a 101 X 3' KqGNAVOX sign to existing pole s'ign. Mr. Gundy pointed out <br />that there is preseiatly one sign of approxirnately 48 : qua.re feet in size for three <br />businesses and that it ?,m Gentirely possibTe that each of these businesses could hwve <br />erected their owaz 50 'sru.9re foot sign in the same way as other businesses in the area <br />h2ve done. Boara mernbers felt that the one sign for three busira.esses was superior. <br />Mr. Cutler stated that the sign addition would be self contained, no -wires, etc. and <br />that it would be in-terr2a11y illuminated - not flasYsing. Mrs. Eian movea to grant a <br />variance for a101 X 31 additioxz to existing pole :sign pencling written permission from <br />King Qutomotive and Suburban Travel Gervice; seconded by Mr. Graene and passed. <br />7. Appellan-tr Bauer Development Co. Request to erect a direlling a-t 5858 Revere 1?rive <br />with a 401 front yard. <br />request is in viol.ation of Ordinance #62-33, Seetion 1159.01 whi.ch re- <br />quires a 501 front yard. <br />?'resent: Mr. Bauer a,nd another representative of Bauer Developrnent Co., Mr. Oring and <br />aZl of the homeowners listed under previous hea.ring for Bauer Developn.ent. <br />Mr, Bauer explained that although the lot in question wa.s 137.98' across the front, a <br />4.01 ditch with run.xling water cuts dcross the Iot at angle and tlzat i;he house must be <br />placed forward on the lot in order to fit. He has a buyer z'°or a$44,000 house to be <br />erected on this Iot. The persons interested in the nouse do not want it unTess a three <br />car garage is i:acludec3. There are 4 adults in the fami1y a.nd tl3eir present house has a <br />triple garagp. I4ir. Oring_ .stated that as previously explained, aIl of the homewoners in <br />the area aie againat any variances being granted. HE suggested re-subdivision of Iots as <br />a mea.ns to avoid varia..r.ces. A petition was presented signed by the Hovorkas, 1'wpaternas9 <br />S?nit?s and Gooc7wins sta.ting that they zse against the varianee requestecl. A4r. Rupers <br />stated that tne Iot ca.n be utilized for another house - it is a buildable I;o??7and th,-,.t <br />asthotically the proposed house iz ircorrect as it would break the Iine of the street. <br />Councilman. WESt stt^tecl that he felt that the set up was not good, thc house would be too <br />close to the ditch, etc. PZr. Greere moved to d.eny the variance reauest; seconc].ed Uy <br />Mrs. Eian and passed, <br />8. Appel7..ant: Livii3g Homes, Inc. RequPst to er.ect a dwelZing on S/L 16 Byron Drive <br />with a 481 81' rear yard. <br />Reruest is ir? violation of Ordinance #,62-33, Section 1163.01 wli.ic?.? <br />requires a 50' rear yard. <br />Present: Mre 'Stein from Living Hames <br />Mr. Stein e:mlained tlat aIl of the lo-ts in their developnient are 701 Y 155' and that <br />tlaeir raodels will A1 fit on these Iots. HovTever.9 the buyer of tlie house proposed for <br />this lot i;ran.ts larger bedrooins -,,rhich woulcl necessitate a :small va-riance. There is all <br />ppen land belainc7 the lots ira question. Mr. Roberts moved to grant up,"to a 1;° re?.r <br />,y.a.ra var•iance; seconrled by ?ir. Greene aad. passecl. <br />The meeting was s.djourned at 10c15 P.M. <br />Riclaard NeIson, Chairmar_ <br />y , 5a11lyHenk1P, Secretary