Laserfiche WebLink
,. BoAPD oF zoNzNG aPpEALS - 11/7/68 -Page z <br />Present : Nir. Strauss - NSr. 5tra.usS presented ci. Ietter from Mrs. Frommeyer stating tnat she was in agreement with <br />the reguest. It was also explained that I-80 wi11 be directly behincl the house. Mrs. <br />7i?a.a.n moved to grant a 81 rear ya.rd ve riance;: seconded by Mr. Greene and passed. <br />4. APpel]_ftnt,_;_.:-Bauer. Develonment Co. Request for extension of ti:,?e for oite sign on <br />corner of Bellevue Drive and Fitch Road. A 5ix rsor-_th permit was granted <br />on L,./3/68. <br />Request is in violation of OrdiLlance.#62-33, Section 1225.0I (C-2). <br />Present: RepresPr-_tc__tive,of BauPr DeveIopznent.Co.? Mr, Orin; represer_ting Olmsted ti^loods <br />Homeowners Association, I`Tr. and Mirs. Cmstanzo, Mr. and I'Ars. Demerling, Mr. <br />Rupers, Mr. Leo Swietyn.iowski, Mr. anel Mrs. Fober.t Swietyriiowski, Tir. and Mrs. <br />Koh1.ma.yer., Mrs. Freeh, Mr. nTienenke, Mr. Kreidler, Mr. and pvlrs. C:al.dwell, <br />Mr. and tirs. Wiley, Mrs. McCauley, Mr. Bukovich, Mr. Mele, Mr. and r`Irs. <br />Hennessy, Mr. and Mrs. Hoaglarid, Mr. Ga.rroll. <br />Mr. Oring stated that on behaZf of the 0lmsted Woods Honr.eowners Association he -?rished to <br />state that there are: signs througaout the development and that they block vision and are <br />cletremental to the neigllborhood. He requested tha.t a11 vta.riance requests made b3r Mr. <br />$auer be d.enied. 14r. Atelson reacl the code requirements ior 8ubdivisior_ signs and it was <br />explained tha.t so Iong as construction is being activel.y pursued, the sigxis are permissaUle. <br />T'_neir number and. size are xegulated by the code. . Pair. Oring stated t11at he felt there were <br />inore signs being used than the code permits c-nd Mr. Cundy Stated that he and aa1 inspector <br />would cheek on ther?. at once. Mr. Greene pointed out that signs a-re necessary to the sale <br />- of housos a.nd that the many compla.ints being voiced by t1ae parties present were not under <br />` the juxisd.zction of the Board. The Board is on1y conszdering the extension af tirne for <br />- one sign. Since there was sor.2e question of the nuniber of Signs in use., Mr. Roberts ?noved to continue the case to the next meeting for the purpose of checking on this situa.tioiz; <br />seconded by yTrs. Eian an.d passed. <br />5. Appella.nt; H. M. BurYe, 3161 West 231 Street. Request to erect a detached garage <br />18' from existing clweTling a.nd 31 from rear Iot Iine. <br />R.equest is in viOl?tian of Ordirimance #62-3.3, Section 1151.04 which re- <br />-quires that a detachee7 garage be so Ioeatea that no part of sasne shaI.1 <br />bP vr1.thin 201 of uny dwelling and slia11 be a riiniMUm of 5' froin aaay <br />property line. <br />Present: Mr. Haas from Forest City Materia].s, Mr. Miller <br />2t was expIained that the lot in a,uestion i;s of irregular shape •and tlaat tre SE corner <br />of the gara.ge would be 31 from tlZe lot line wlv.le the other corner zmuld be 18. The Iot <br />is 691 x 1301 f1t its shallowest point and exter_ds to 69' x 1381. A letter signed by <br />Bunchers, Sneads, Millers and Bowsers indica-ting their approvc.I of the proposal -wTas pre- <br />sented. Mr. Greene movecl to gra,nt a. 21 redr yard varie-nce for SE corner of garagE and <br />a 21 variance on dist2nce between llouse G.nd garage; seconded ly Mr. Roberts and passed. <br />6. -kppellant: . Ji.m HoIPn° s T(T,, 2683L;. Lorain Road. Request ta acld to exitsting pole <br />sign. j,Iith proposed addition, sign would be in excess of permitted <br />_ square footage. <br />Reaxuest is in violation of Ordinance #62-33, Section 1225.02. <br />Present: Mr. HoIen9 fiob Cutler irori Cutler Signs <br />Mr. Holen explained that he neeas identification for his main line of Magnavox. He