Laserfiche WebLink
' i . • - .. ' . ' . •, '.? ' ? . . ? , .. . <br />? ' . ? . ' . s ? ? , ., . . , .. . , ..., . ?' . ' . , . <br />? PLANNING COMP4ISSION 3/25/69 - Pa0`3;" . <br />A resident of 22143 Lorain Road cited 'tke tra.ffic problem a.rid getting <br />Qut onta Loraia Roac1. She feels, that apartnentswauZd be imposSible. <br />•, •.,Mrs, grgnalc9 2$596 Loraia Road, sta'ted that $hegr otan six acres directZg <br />acrosa from the Pmat Offiee., She as&ed a.baut the prmpoaed zoning in <br />'. thYS lacatiox. She was adv3.sed that the area would be zaed 5001 bacls <br />for mi.xed multi-fami.l.y. She obj ectea to. the rezoning. ' <br />Mrs. Diehr, '25195 Loraia Road' asked if North 0]msted was to be osaly <br />; for Iarge businesses and apartaentse Her preseat busixess would be <br />nom.-conformirag arad she objects 't,o ta.zay rezoxing. . , <br />Mr. Tesset, z8364 Loxain A.mad, asked for a definitien of ion-cosnfarming <br />use. He feels that the,a°ezoning timuld be discriminatvey because they <br />, couldn't expand their businesses, Mr. Schznidt, 23904 L'orain Rc9ad, st&ted tkat he aperates the Nartla <br />Olmsted Mower Shop. Siace mo expansion would be per,;aitted a aon- <br />conforni?g busixaess9 he £ee3.s it is vers? unfair to anyone in a small <br />, busimess. He feeTs the City wou].d be telgi.rig him hoi•r much money he <br />, ca.n make. ' . <br />Mr. Hendersmn.,,25149 Lorain Road,:asked if there wr,uld be any provision <br />fvr rezouirag in the futttre to allr3w for umforeseea sittaations, Mr. <br />Esgar expZained that anyone can submit ata application for rezoning of <br />land at axiy time. Applications wou].d always be coffisidered b3* the <br />Plarnixg Corami.ssion anel Coumcil. , <br />' Tkese being no furthur nueations or comments' Mr. Esgax stated that <br />, aZl suggestions and,comtnettts wvuld be cvnsidered befmre the meeting <br />on 4/8/69 tirhen a fixial x°ecomm.emdation would be made and voted on. <br />Mr; Ledvir3a ffioved that the follmwing recommendatioa be made to Conncil: <br />It is recommended tka.t existing zoni.r-ig legislation be reviewed and <br />new 1.egislation be prepared to pravide for the follow3.ng types of <br />apartments: Garden type -- Up to and includuag 2? floors9 Mediuin <br />R.ise - From 3 tc> and including g f'loors' High Rise -- Frvm 9floors <br />aald up.. In cottjUnction srith our suggested rezoning for Lerain R.oad, <br />it becarae evident to us that it is mot alwmys feasible tm define the <br />exact divisions betweers nediurs rise afid garden type apartments. R'Iedium <br />rise apartmenta should have appreciabTe separation from single fa.iaily <br />x°esidencesp but in this separation distaxice it would be legical to <br />build garclen type apartmemts. It is theref ore recommended that City <br />Council prepare legislation fos° the defixiition of a new Mixed 14ulti- <br />Femi19 zoning use wha.ch would provide for raixing garden type and mediun <br />rise apartments and single family residences. . Mx°. Nelson secomded <br />the motion. Unasaimously passed. , <br />(b) Zarenba Apartment Rftzonir?? - Mr. Ledvina sta.ted that he and Mr. Byers <br />had been working on this proposal ix conjunction with the Lorain F.oad <br />study. Mre LecZvina moved to reqaa.e.st a 30-day eptenaien because of a <br />y Mr. Leomarcl and una.nimously <br />traffic survey- that is being made; seconded b <br />passed. .