06/19/1969 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF NORTH 0124STED - BOARD OF ZDNING APPEALS Regular Meetizig held at City Hall --- June 19., 1969 The rneeting wa,s ca]1ed to order at 7:3$ P.M. by c?irman Jolari RobQrt-s. Those Present; Mrse Eian, Nissrs. Greene, Roberts, Davis Alsa Present: Mre Gundy, Build3.ng Commissioner The rniilutes of the 5/28/69 meeting were approved as written. 1. Appellarit: Benedetto J, Polliee' 26102 Defoe Drive. Request to erect 4 sections of 61 fence and 2 sections of 51 fence around patio area. Request is i.xi violation ef €lydinance #62-33, Sectiom 1151.04, fence shall not exceed 41 in 11eight. Present: Mrs. Pollice Mrs. Pollice explaixied that they live on a cul-de-sac street and that the lligher sections of fence would step down to 4t sect3.ons whi.ch ioUdcomple'?ely encloSe the yard. The sections in question would provide privacy .f.mr. the pativ and pvol area of the yard. Her neibhbors have no objections to the .fence and there is A vacant field to the xear of the property wlaich will eventually be a park. Mr. Greene moved ta gra.nt a 2' variance irl height for 321 of fence and a Is variance in height for 16, of fence. Mrs. Eian seconded the motion. Unanimously passed. 2. Appellant: John J. Kunkel, 3857 BristcaZ La.ne. Request to erect 5' fence around patio. Request is in violation of Qrdinance #62-33p Sectiott 1151.04, fenee not to exceed 41 in heioht. Present: Mr. Kunkel Mr. Kunkel explained that his honie is on the corner Iot of Bristol Lane and Chapel Hill Drive. The backyard is completely exposecl to traffic on Canterbury. Road and Chapel Hi7.l Drive and there is ao privacy whatsoever. There is on1y a small section of the fence tha.t would be in violation since it was deter,aiined that this was a windbreak rather than a fence which allows the additional height sQ Imng as it is located 151 from the property line. Approximately 11 sections (I2" )would be 13" 8" f'='om the prvperty Iine instead o£ the recauired 151. Mrs. Eian moved ta grant a variance for approx3.;nately 12 -$1 sections of 5' fence. Mr. Greene secondsd the motion. IInanimously passed. 3. Appellant; James R. Speck9 24931 Doe Dri've. Request to erect detached garage 31 from property Iine. Request is in v.io.Iation of Urdinance #62-33, Section 1151.04 which requires that a detache3 garage be a minimum vf 58 fron any Iot Iine. Present: . Mr.. Speck., Mrs Ada.ms Mr. Speck statedmthat there is a swale at the rear of his lot so that garage cannot be moved Furthur back. It would be a severe liardship tm get into.the secomd seetion of garage if it is locatecl 51 from the property line. Mr. Adamg, hi.s next deor neighbor, stated that he has no obj eetion to the garage being 31 from hi-s property Iine. It was poixlted out t'mat there are many siinilar situations in thia Meighbmrhood. Mr. Greene moved to grant a variance o.f 21. Mr. Davis seconded the motion. Unanimously passedv 4. Appellant: Robert A. Kvvacs, 24476 Noreen Drive. Request to erect a 41 fence on a corner lot, -Request is in violation of Ordinance r?`r62-33' Section 1151.04, fence a._long street line may not exceed 30t' in height. Present: Mr. Kovacs