06/19/1969 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BQARD OF ZOAtING APPEALS - 6/19/69 - Page 2 Mr. Kovacs explained that he Iives on the corinQr of Noreen Drive and tiTalter Road. He has small children and wishes to enclose the rear yard for their protectiono However9 along the Walter Road side, onlY 30" fence is permitted b3* the codea This weuld not. serve as any protection and_Z-lalter Road is a quite busy street. The fence would be chain lixik. It was determined tha.t a.pproximateTar 1120 of the fence would be in violationo It was determiiled that the fence would not be a safety hazards Mr. Davis moved to gra.nt a variance for that portion of the fence a].ong ti1al:ter R.oad. Mr. Greezze seconded the r,aotion. Unanimously passed. 5. Appellanta Hennie Ho:nes. Request to erect dwelling at 4631 Westview Drive 20' from the side line an a corner loto R.equest is in v3.olation of Ordinance -#62-33, Section 1159.02 wh3.ch requires a minirium setbACk of 25' on a corner lot. Present: Mr. Puzzitello' Mr. Moss Mr, Puzzitello explained that the Iot in q_uestion was original.Iy.nat a corner lot but that izhen R.anda.7.1 Drive was eytended, it became such. The plans _ are for a ranch-style house with attached double garage valued at approximately $41,000. He presented a petition sigta.ed by a11 of the persons receivixig notification of the hearing except for Mr. Yesbergero AI1 were in favor of the variance being granted. It wa.s also poiaated out that-on a1I of-the other corner lots in the area., a sianilar variance had been granted to enable the building mf Iarger., bettex homes. Pla.nS were studied and it was determined that a 4.6' variance would be necessaryo Mr. Greene raoved to grant a variance of 4.61. Mr. Dagis seconded the motion. Unanimously passed. 6. Appellant: Kroger Co,, Union Comt:ierce Ba,nk, Super - X Drug, corner of Lorain and Stearns Roads Request to erect a co-op pole sign 26' i.n height and with the Kroger portion of the sign in excess of permitted square footage. Request is in v3.olation of Ordinance #62-33' Section 1225.02. Present: Mr. Maheri (representing Brilliattt Electric Sign Coe). Mr. Kacirek Pla.ns were presented for a co-op poZe sign 261 high with the I{roger portion of said sign -Uhe size 15,61, X 51. The Union Commerce Bank and Super-X Drug portions would be less.-thaA ' permitted-by the code. It was pointed.out.-tha.t.each of the three businesses.could erect their own pole signs of up to _50 square feet in size witheaut any var3.aneea As a total, the three- sign areas would be less than the 150 -squa.re feet-=pernu.tted for alI three, but I{rogerls sign would be approxi-matelg 28 square feet in excesso Discussion.was held on the desirability of eZiminating two additional pole signS by means of the co-op sign. Tt was felt-that the co-np sign could meet the 25' height requirement with no problem. It was also felt that the Kxuger portion of the sign cotld be reduced. Mrs. Eian moved tv continue the case so that a new drawiLlg could be made with the over-aIl height not exceeding the permitted 25' and with the Kroger sign reduced in size, Mr. Greene seconded the motion. IInanimously passed. 7m Appellant: Walter Gmns'ka' 5690 Revere Drivee Request to erect partial patio enclosure 51 high and 101 from side lot line. Request is in violation of Ordi.na.nce #62-33, Section 1I51.04 which requires that no part of such a windbreak be closer than 151 to a.ny lot line. Presenta Mrs. Gonska Mrs. Gonska explained that their patio is completely exposed on three sides and that they wish to erect a 54 basketweave fence in order to prvvide some measure of privacy. None of the neighbor•.-s have any objections. Mrs. Eian moved to grant a variance of 51. Mre Greene seconded the motion. IInanimvusly passed.