Laserfiche WebLink
CITY dF NORTH OLMSTLD - BOART) OF ZONING APPEALS <br />Regular Meetiug held at Citg HalI ---- 14ag 28, 1969 <br />The meeting was called to order at 7>36 P.M. by Ch83.raan John Robertsa <br />Those Present: Mra. Eian, Mssrs. Greene, Roberts, Lancashire <br />AZso Preseffit: Mrs Gundy, Building ComrL.i.ssioner <br />The minutes of the 5/7/69 meeting were approved wS.th,the fo].Iawing coa°rectien: Under <br />Hearing No. 7- last sentence should read "The motion passed with Mr. LancashirQ and <br />A4r. ForceZliazi vot3ng mm.". <br />1. Appellant: Don G. MeDaniels., 3791 Cmlumbia Road. .Conti.nuatian mf request to erect <br />a detached garage 31 f'resffi existing dwelling. Request is ill vio3ation af <br />Orc'l3naffice #62-33, Section.1151.04 wkich requires a detached garage to be <br />a miniamm mf 201 firom dwelling. <br />Presents Mr. McDazzi.el, Mr• SearmaA <br />Air. McDaniel presented plans for attaching garage to house by means of a roofed area. <br />Mr. Gundy stated that this would not constitute an attached garage and that variances <br />would still be necessary. In order to be con5idered an a.ttached._garage., there must be <br />a comon waZl. Since all possibilities regarding location of a garage had bee-n studied <br />and board Lmembers felt not having a garage was a real hardsh.i.p, Mr. Greene moved to grant <br />a 151 varia.nce Uetween nouse and garage, a, 21 rear atzd 3' side yard variance an.d I11 <br />variance betweea garage and adjacent dNeZling for semi-attached garage with distance <br />between house and garage to be covered by rmof as per plan presonted. Mrs. Eian seconcled <br />the motion. IInanimously passed. <br />2. Appellant: Sinclair Oil Co., SE Corner of Larain Road and Park Ridge Drive. Request <br />to erect servi.ce sta'uion !,rithin 5001 of tne.Post Office. Request is in <br />violation of Ordi.nance #62-339 Section 1173.02 (H) which states that a <br />gasoline atation cannot be Ioca•ted within 5004 of any Ivt occupied by <br />an exiating public huilding. <br />Preseiit; Mr. ScanloM and Mr. Lambros, legal council for SincZair Qil Co; Mr. Webster, <br />Mr, Ricky9 Mr. Foocly, Numerous other residents of Park Ridge Subdivision. <br />Mr. Roberts read the defini-tion of a public building receivecl from the Law Direct.or, <br />Basically a public buildiiig is deterrLiuied no't by own.ership but by use. Mrm Scanlon <br />sta.ted that the Law Directorls definition r.aken fram Black° s Law Dictianery applied to <br />states other 'tha.n f?hio.- Mre Scanlon contended that a public 17uilding is a pZace that <br />is a public gathering pZace and stated that the Tdorth Ol.msted Post Office is not a <br />public building beeause it is not a public gathering placeo He furtllur stated that <br />the property ownerst rights were being taken away because the area is zaned commercial <br />and that na notices were-sen-t out to them before the Post Office was constructed last <br />year. He requested that SincYair QiI Co. be permitted to proceed. A2r. Roberts read a <br />letter fron Mr. John Jack vf the West Park - Forest Ridge Civia Association stating <br />their obj ection tv a variance being grantedo Mr. Jack Webster read a statemen-t on-be- <br />half of the people of the Park Rid.ge Civic Associ.ation statirag their obj ections to a <br />varia.nce. Mro Ricky a.nd Mr. Foody both sta.teel that thcy felt we shmuld adhere to the <br />ordinance. Mr. Scan1.om cited. cases where ruZings have been atade against spac3.ng <br />ordinancesb].seithere? Mr. Greene stated that-the Board can't rule on the ordinanee. <br />On the ba.si:s_.o£.. the Hoard acting on a definition orally subm3.tted by the Law. Director <br />with written cvnfirmation sent aut by post.. Mrse Eian moeed to deny the variaxxj..ce d.ue <br />to lack.of hardship. Mr: Lancaslv.re seconded the ffiotion. Unanimously passed. Mr. <br />Sca..nlon -stated that he wa.s hereby -xicsti#yiiig the Board o£ their. intention _to. appea1 -on <br />the basi.s--af- the.--North OTizsted Zoning-f}rdiziaMCe. He requested a-n estinsate on the number <br />of persons attending the hearing. It was decided that there were approxiraa.te].y 125