Laserfiche WebLink
BOARll QF ZONING AP.PEALS - 5/2$/69 - paga 2. <br />peraons in attendance. <br />3. Appell.ant: John- Baratko. Request- -for spec%a1 ner-mt to buiZd an addition onto <br />non-conforming building Imcated at 23845 Laraif1 Ros.cl. Permit - requested <br />as per Ordinance #62-33, Section 1231.02 and 1133.12. (ContinuatiQn) <br />present; '+2r. Baratko, Mr. Fedor ( attc9rney) <br />Mr.:Roberts read a 1etter from Mr. Lorc3'.Assistant Law Director, stating that the _ <br />setback taas nmt part of the yard requirementse Mr. Fedor restated pZans for the <br />addition Nrhi.ch would conforim in aII ways but in setbacke The addition imuld be even <br />witz t3ie existing front which i5 set back 37' 3.nstead of the required 50t. Plans "are <br />for a first-class resta,urant to be lrno?m as Elzonats Red Cax°pet_- Inn. Board raembers <br />expressed_a _desire - for Ianelscaping in front o£ the builc?ing witli nv customer parking <br />in this area. Mr. Baratko stated that he ?,ould be in agreement vrith this. On the <br />basis of the Assistant Law Directo?^'s letter,' Mro Greene iaoved that a special permit <br />be granted providinb appelZants. do not use frant for cus-terLnor Parking anc7 will landacape <br />as stated. Mr. Lancashire seconded the motion. UnanimousZy passed. <br />1,.. AppelZantt ZIi1Zimn TrTerwage. Request for var3.ance on r•ainimma front wi.dth of Iots <br />in proposed..subdivision of three 401 1Qts into two laroer Iots being <br />61.801 aizd 58.20t o Three existing Iats are Ye:tmaneat Parcel #?_35-12- <br />58, 59 and 60 South Porter Roade Request is in violation of Ordinance <br />#62-33' Section 1157,0I which requires a:ninimum £rontage in a B <br />district of 701. <br />Present: Mro Werwage, Mr. Scharer, ?ulr. Steiner, T'tr. a.nd Mrs. Longcoy, Mr. and P4rss Graf <br />Mr. Roberts read a section fron the Planiiing Commission minutes dated 5/13/69 wherek?y <br />approva:L for subdivision of the Iots in question was given pending the a-loprovaI of'the <br />Board of Zaning Appezls, Mro Gundy painted out that this would actuaIIy be an_.improve- <br />ment since there are nvw 3- 400 lotso Two la.rger lots would be advantageous. The <br />neighbors in question agreed that two lots iaould be better -tinan three maZl onea. Mrs. <br />Eian ;aoved ta grant variance to subdivi.de .three:.exa.;A_?ng 40t.. Iats i-i1to tjao Iots of <br />6I.$0t an.d 58.201 as pronosed. Mr. Greene secanded the motion. Unan3lio?isl;* passed. <br />5. -kppellants Mrs. Asvin BeduYui, a1,,2 Grace Road. Request to enclose rear yard on <br />a corner Iot with 6' fence. Rea,uest is in violation of Ordinance ?6z-33, <br />section 1151m04 which sta-bes that a fence may not exceed 4t in height <br />and may not be more than 30" in height a.7.ong street lineo <br />Presenta Mrs. Beduhn' Mre Pangrac <br />P+irs. Becluhm explained that her home is o71 -the corner of Grace and Brookpaxk Roads. <br />Jamestown v3_Ilage Apartments.are 5° from the rear of her lot. A 61 fence would provide <br />some measure of privacy on this busy eorner and from-the apartments. She pointed out <br />tMAt the residents on the vpposite corner have the same height fenceo Mr. Pangrac asked <br />what type of fence was proposedo Mrs. Beduhn stated tha.t it Nould be a white wide raiZ <br />residential type feace, He Stated tha.t he has no objection to thiso Board raenibers feIt <br />that there was a definite hardship in this loca.t3on.a ??Ir. Greene :noved to grant tcie <br />variance; seconded by Mrs. Eian and unanimouslg passecl. <br />6, ?lppellant: Iralter S. Buyer, 251$6 Fawm Drivse Request to erect deta.ched garage <br />141 from adj acent dwel.Iing. Request is in violation -of Qrdinance #62-33, <br />Section 1151.04 which. requires a minimu.m distance of 201 between detached <br />garage and any dwelling. <br />Present: Rgr. Buyer