12/01/1971 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS - 12/1/71 - Page 2 AZl witnesses were sworn in. Mr. Gates presented plans. Mr. Rol1 asked if both homes wou].d be the same. He was told they were, Mr. Tubbs asked why Mr. Gates did not conform to the code. Mr. Gates stated that 3.t would be too costly. Mr. Tubbs made a motion to grant a 201 var3.ance on S/L 201 seconded by Mrs. Eian' and unanimously passedo 5, AppeZlanto Hennie Homes - Request to erect a dwelling at 3915 Wood Park Lane with a]..5' side yard variance (1133.13) .Request is in va.olation of Ord. #62-33, Section ii59.029 which requires a minirnum setback on a corner 1ot of 251. Present: Mr. Richard Puzitello. Mr. Puz3.te11.o was sworn in. He presented a p7.cture of the proposed home. A discussion was heldo Mr. Roberts asked how much of an overhang 3.s there? Mr. P uzitello said a.t was a foot. Mrs. Eian moved to grant a 1,5' side yard variance; seconded by Mr. Tubbs and unanimously granted. 6. Appellants Bauer Development - Request for varxance (1133.13) to erect dwelling at 3903 Canterbury Rd. with a 103090' setbacko ftequest is in violation of Ord. #62-33, Section 1159e01' which xequires a 501 front yard. Presen-t: iMro John J. Alan, Mr. John Then, Mr, Henry Rienhard, and Mr. F. Lavoie. Al1 witnesses were sz-iorn 3.n. Mre Roberts read a 1etter from Mr0 A1an, stating that because of the number of trees on this 1ot, he would like to set the hotzse back far enough away from the trees, Mr. Then and Mr. Reinhard had no objection. Mr. Lavoie had an ohjection to the setback. He said that it puts the houses back further and further. Mro Roberts pointed out that by lining the houses up the way they as°e9 on an angle., they are making it 1.ook much better. Mr. Tubbs moved to grant a 40' front yard var3.ance or up to 1101 setback. It was seconded by Nirs. Eian and unanimously passed. 7, Appellant: HiZde Ludwig and Chester E. Gordon, Trustee, - Request for heara.ng of Appeal on rejectyon of appl.i.cat3.on for retail store by D. H. Ra,nsbury, Officer and Assistant Cyty Engineer (letter dated October 5, 1971 proposed 7-11 Store in viol.ation of Section 1141.04 Ordinance #62-339 which requix°es Retail. Business Zoning have at least 50 feet of frontage on Lox°ain Road or Brookpark Rdo) as requi.red by Ordinance #62-33, Section 1133.08. Present: Mrso Hilde Ludwig, Chester E. Gordon9 and Mr. Walter Masono Al1 witnesses were sworn in. Mr. Roberts read the letter that was written by Dave Ransbury, to the architect, and also a letter from Clague Road Congregational Chureh. The CYiurch is very concerned about the traffic problem should this variance be granted9 additional traffic introduced to this area would further accent th3.s problemo Nr. Gordon stated that this 1ot has a 2001 frontage on Lorain Road and is a singl.e parcel, therefore they have the required frontage. At one time Mrs. Ludwig asked that this parcel be subdivided into two parcels and was tvrned down by the Planning Commission. She has 1.eased the front of this parcel, which is 14019 to Sun Oi1 Co. and the back of the parcel, which is 901 , to the Southland Corp. for the 7-11 Store,