Laserfiche WebLink
BC3A.RD CF ZONIi•TG .ArPEALS -(6/?/7I) - Page 2 <br />? 5. Anpellant: La.wrence Smith, 5526 Revere Drive - ReQuest for varia.nce on existing 51 <br />fence screening portion of rear yarc). Violation Ordinance #62-33, Section <br />115Io04, fence not to exceed 41 in height. <br />r resent: Mr. and r'•irs. Smith <br />Mr. and A4rs. Smith ex?lained that th.e fence is of reciwood basketweave cons Lruction and <br />runs 321 up each side prova.r.ing privacy for the rear yard. They presented a Ietter signed <br />b,y nine neighbors stating thpt they have no objections. A Ietter was received iror2 Mr. <br />and Mrs. Jere Potter also stating that they ha.vn no objec'tione. PYIrs. Eian moved to grP.nt <br />1_1 tFariance to .permit existing 6G,' of 51 fence; secanded by P•'Iro Scheef and unanimously <br />passed. <br />5. Appellant: Ti1a.lter Marsick, 4108 Tennyson Zane - Request for variance to erect St f'ence <br />around reGr far.d. Violation Ordinance #62-33, Section 115I.04, fence not <br />to exceeu 41 in height. <br />Present: Mr. MFrsick <br />14r. Marsick ea-plained that the narkirg Iot for the Canterbury Souare Recreztion Area is <br />a.t the immediate rear of his pronerty. He has three Sma,I.I children and a ge?mGn shenwrd <br />dog and wi vhes t« erect the higher• fence for added pro tecti-on. He cited th.e znanv peaple, <br />ca.rs P-nd general congestaon in the a.rea and sta.ted that the rea.r fence ?.,ould be 1ocated <br />101 in irom h:?s rear 1ot line because of a basketball area at the immediate rear. The <br />neighbors h?ve no objection. The fence would be a.iz anchor ty-oe fence. DiscusGi-on waG <br />held. Mrs. Eian moved to grant a I' varia.nce to permit 51 rence 101 in from rear Iot Iine <br />a_,nd extending clot,m side: -to reax of house; seeondecl by Mrm Seheef and passed with ASr. <br />Tubbs voting no. <br />?. Aapellant: Raynand Boadey, 23584 1,%Testchester Drive - Rer;uest for va.riance to erect <br />5° fenee arounc portion of rea.r yard. Violation Orclinance #62-33, Section <br />I151.04, fence not ta exceed 41 in height. <br />Presents Mr. Boodey <br />1,4r. Foodey ex_r,laineci that there is a common drive betheen lzis houNe and the one next door. <br />^lhere is a.lxeadv a 51 fence on the oApoSite side of the cannon drive and he rZ Ghes to erect <br />one between his house and garage, It would git*e privacv to h:is patio area. Discussion was <br />he? d. P•fr. Tubbs moved to grant a vwriance to erect 59 :.?'ence as inc1i-cated on plot -olan; <br />secondea by Mr. Scheef and unanimously passed, <br />$. Appellanta Narth Olmsted Boa.rd of Education - Request for variance to erect 61 fence <br />along rear of Burns Poad Pro?erties between Butternut Ric?.ge Roa.d and I?2ic1v??.le <br />- -, _...: °_'.Avenuea Vicz7ation E1rd.inance #62-33, Section 1151.04, fence not to exeeed <br />41 in heighte <br />Present: Mrm Deuba.Z, several b'urns Road resid.ents <br />Mr. Deubal expIained that the probosed 61 cyclone £ence would extena from Caster's nronerty <br />line to Iyiidva.le Avenue at the rear oi the Burns Road pronerties. Its _puri ose is to ston <br />the L'iltering in -to the walkway bettireen the Jr. and Sr. High Schools. This would serve to <br />nrotect the Burns Road residentsT proper-cy. There would bs no gates or openi.ngs whatsoevex <br />in tne ience and the culvert would also be.blackec3.o AIl of the re-sioents present asked <br />a,uevtions and were in compIete agreement wzth the aropotia1.. P-Irs. Eian moved to grant a <br />21 variar_ce to permit approximately 2551 of continuous chain link fence from Cwster's <br />nroberty to Midvale .Avenue. If it becomes necessary, the Schoal Baard may install 2 Ii-nes <br />of barbed wirs. 1.1ro Tubbs seconded the motion. Unanimously passecl.