06/02/1971 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?POARD QF Z01dl3!TG APPEALS - ( 6/2;/7I) - Pa ge 3 9. A.pnellan-ts Robert E. AImnuist, 2324.8 Stoneybraok Drive - Reauest to erect addition a.t rewr of existing dwelling 2612" too close -to rear Iot line. Violation Ordinance 4?62-33, Sec-cion 1163.01 which requires a 501 rea,r yard. Presents 14r. and _'•Srs. !'•_lmouist & their archetect., ?2r. Gomersall, Mr. Ricnard.s Mr. and A4rs. Almquist explained tha,t the boarci grantec7 them a smaller v^riance in January for a smaller addition. Since then they have decided that they, kwould ?i.ke to include a.n indoor si,Ti.mming pool, faraila* roam, etc. The house ta the rear of their lot ha.s an attached garage and there are high shrubs a.long the rear lot l.ine. The proposEd addition would conform to the existing c'..welling. Mr. Ricnards cited the view from his house next door being blocked off anci felt that th.is would decrease the va1ue of hic hbme. Mr. Gamersall stated that he doesn1 t Iike the idea of the addit5.on coming so fax back on the lot but stated -that Mr. and Mrs; AIm:?u? ?t had st?ted tha.t.the alternative is an ?.bvve the ground pool in the rear yard that would be enclosed in some way. Mr. Gundy stated that E-ny permanent enclosure would require a variance. Mr. Gomexsall furthur stated that he would pre#'er the indoor pool and proposed addition to any permanent enclasure-type nool in the back ya.rd. Discussion was held. It was suggested that the ?roposed addition could be made small.er and a lesser varia,nce i,•oul.d then be necessarar. h'!r. Scheef moved to continue the ca,se to the next regular meet3.ng; seconded by tirs. Eian and ur_animously passed. 10. ?;.ppellant: Gary Cattren, 5592 Decker Road - RequeBt to build covered pa.tio a.-t rear of existing d-vieiling 016" too close to detached oa.rage, Uiolation f3rdinance h`62-33, Section 1151.04 which requires a min.imum of .20, bet-ueen dwel.ling and any aetached gar?gee Pretien-t: Mr. Cattren, Mr. ti+Tenske Mr. Cattren explained that he wishe:s to bui? d a ra3sed-floor rPC1??rood d.eclf type patio 101 X 241 with an aluminum cover and railings arour_d the deck ex-tending to the roof. Tt i-Tould not be enclased. Mr. 'Wenske stated that he has no objectiona, Mr. Scheef motred to gxa.nt a 9161F variar_ce on distance from patio to deta.ched garage; seconded by Mrs. Eia.n and unanimol-isly passed. lI. Aptaellant: Uedlak Development Corroration - R.e quest ior variance to erect 61 fence around portion of propertv on David Dr3ve for K.entworth Apartments. Violation Ordina-nce ?'62-33, Section I151.04, Fence not to exceec't 41 in heigh Present: Mr. Dan.k repre:senting Mr. Sedlak 14r. Dank expla,ined that children cutting through o.rivewa.ys a-nd parking lot have crea.ted problems and that there have been ?nany cases of vandalisrn. They prorose to erect 4691 of 5t zence which would tie into CEI's 81 fence a.t one point. There are aII condominiums in tne areao Ciscussion was held. Mr. Tubbs moved ta grant a va.riance i'or 469' of 61 fence9 seconded by Mr. Scheef znd unanimously passed. T:ne following corrsction s,*as made to the minu 'ues of the 3f 3/7I meeting: Page 2 line 8 - should. read 160 s.qua,re feet. These :ninutes were a.ppraved as corrected. The minutes of the 5/5/71 and 5/I2/7I meetings were a.pproved as written. T_t was agreed that in accordance with Councilts tracation, the Boara oi Zoning Appeals would also adjoUrn 'Lor the month of JuIy. The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 P.M. John. Roberts, Chairnan ? Sallv Henlcle, Fecretary