My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/05/1971 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1971
>
1971 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
05/05/1971 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:37:06 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 4:11:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1971
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/5/1971
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
50ARD 0F ZONIPTG APpEP1,S ( 5/5/7? )-iDage 3 <br />3. -kppellant: Thomas Gallagher, 28644 Lora.in Rowd - Reguest for special ruling re: <br />d.eninl by N. 0. City Planning Commisgion at hea,ring held an 4/13/71. <br />Ruling reeiuested as per Ordin.=.nce ;!,62-33, Section 1I33.09. <br />PxeGen-t: iL7r. GaIlagher, Mr. Gareau (Attornev) <br />The Citv La,w Director was asked to exp-Iain the functi.an of the Zaning Baard in this matter. <br />He citec3 drGZnance ;3!62-33, Sec-tion 1133o06, 2133.07 and 1133.09. Mr. Gareau stated that <br />they reel the Planning ComraiSSion considered matters tha.t were not under their juri,sdiction <br />w'nen turning down the request at their meeting on 4/13/71. He stated that the plan had <br />7 more pa.rking spaces than required by orGinance and that only nwrking was to be approsed <br />har the Planning Co.G-?rnissian. Tt was pointed. out that this mattex has not been rejected by <br />Gouncil Lut is presently in comimittee. 2t was the feeling of the 7aning Loard that they <br />coulc not take any action at this narticuZar time arid that the reauest was irnproperly <br />before the 3aard. <br />9, Harolc? Springer, 23645 DAvid Drive - F.eouest far special nern7it to erec-u tool shed at <br />rear of Iot. i'ermit reouested as per Ordinance 1"62-33, Section 1133.49. <br />Present; r7r. S-oringer <br />Mr. SpringPr explained that he needs the shed for storage of laian equinment, etc. His <br />neighbors have no objection ?nd there is aIZ vacpnt land at the rear which is owned b;r St. <br />Brendanls Church. The shed would be 7' X10' a.nd woulc be lo^.ated 61 ofi both rear and <br />side lo 'u lines. iflr. Scheef moved to grGnt a speciGl permit; seconded by Mr. Tubbs and <br />unani.mous? y passed. <br />10. Appeilant: t-'tichael Korinka - Reciuest for va.riance an mznimiri front wirlth af lots, in <br />proposed subdivision ol' P. Pf #235-13-??.-7-ao, 101, 1029 106, ].07, 108, 109, <br />110 Decker F.oad into six laraer Za?ts a-?' 501 and 601 tiridth. Reauest is in <br />viol2tion of Ordinance ;w'bz 33, Section 1157.01 which requires a mir_imum <br />of 70' fronta,ge in a "B" district. <br />Present: Nir. Korinka, Mr. Carnenter, i•Rr. La.ndenberg <br />'Mr. iCorinka exrlainecl that he -wishes to make t'ne existing 40' lots into lots of 50' a.nd <br />601 wifths. It wu.s noted that i°qr. Fretthold '_nad c-.iled ;?rior -to the meeting and stated <br />th.:t.t he c?ic??r.'t object to the 60' lot.s but c?id object to ?a.ny 501 lots. Mr. C?.r?aEnt?r and <br />Mr. La.ndenberg statea that they also oprose 50' lots but that 601 is acc?^-ptable. It was <br />sug?!estea t'nat ivir. Koririlca might m_ake 3? ots out of 5 insteac of 4 lots. 1he o-ther 3 <br />? ots eould. still be made into 2 lots. -Mr. iCorkin.ka w-as agreea.ble to this suggestion. Mr. <br />Scheef movPd. to an-prove subdivic?ing ; 100, 101 and 102 into two larcer Iots ea.ch 601 v'i.d.e <br />and #lOb, 107, 108, 109 and 110 into three 1arger 1ots each 66.671 wide. Mr. Tubbs seconcled <br />the motion. tJnanimously pa.ssed. <br />The meeting was adjourned at I0:40 P.M. <br />John Roberts, Chairman <br />SallzT Henkle, Secretasy
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.