05/05/1971 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• BdARD OF ZOPIITIG APPFALS ( 5/5/7I )- Page 2 .i, ? read from the S;Test ?arls Forevt Ridge Civic Association obj ecting tv an-y variance. Mr. Beckley stated that he also obj ects. Mr. and ?'4rs. Callagher and Mr. `riodermorsky stated that they have no objection. It was felt that the request would have lit.-Lule effect on any of the residences 3n Foxest Fidge or talest Park and that the property -,,Tould be re- turn.ed to ite. original condition. Discussion was helcl. Mr. Tubbs moved to grant a variance until 8,/1f71 for temporary gravel slag narking area an conditian that ax"ter 8/1/71 it is to be restorecl. to its original conditian and reseeded ar a haxd.-ton drive installed; seconded by Mr. Scheef and una:nLnousl:y pa.ssed. 5. Appellantc Carl Kessler, Jr., 5451 Whitehaven Avenue - Recauest to erect detachecl rara.ge 3t from side.lot line. Rea;uest is in violation of Qrdinance # 62-33, Section II51.04 which rerauires a r:iini.?-num of 51 between garage and any lot line, Present: Mr. Keswler Mr. Keasler expZa?ned that ha.s lat is 50' wide and that it would be very difficult to enter the ane siae of the gwra;e if it is mavea over 51 from the lot 1ine. His neighbors have no abject?on. Mr. Scheel' ?notred to grant a 21 variance; seconded by Mr. Tubbs ar_d unanimiously Passed. 6e Appellant: Richard Van Dalen, 1,?.53 Georgette - Rec;uest ta build an acic?ition to existing c1«elling I11 from detached ga,rage on ow'n propert* and I11 from rieighbort s c?et,n,ched garage. Re7uest is in violatian of Ordinance ; 6.2-33, Section 1I51.04 which recruires a minimu_m of 20t bet-ween dwelling and a.ny cletached garage. P'resent; A4r. Van Dalen Mr. LTwn Dalen ExplIa,ined that the4r need additional space and that even though he has an 1501 Iot, tne ad.aition wou1d be toa clvse to both .'nis o?,m and his neighbort s garage. Mr. Walsh and Mr, Katzen, i.m%nediate neighbars9 have no objec'uion. The aadition wz11 conform to the original dwellZng. Mr. Scheef rnoved to gr2nt a 9' variance on disluance between detached garage and both dwelZings; seconded by Mr. Tubbs and unaninausly passed. 7. Appellant: Bauer nevelaDment - Gantinuation oz" requea.t to erect c1wellings on the f'ol1owing oublots with a 351 setback: S/L 245 - 27401 Plantucket Drive, S/I, 206 -?7?85 Nantucket Drive) S/`L 2d7 - 27371 Nantucket Drive, S/L 209 - 27325 Nantucket L'rive, S/L 212 - 2724-1 Nantucket. Rea,uest is in viola.tion a:f drdinance ;,'162-33, Section 11559.01 S,rhicn recuires a 501 setbwek. Present: Mr. Bauer, Mr. Oring representing the Homeawners :4ssociation Mr. Robexts read a Ietter fror,i the City Engineer dp-ted 4/7/71 which stated that B/L 205 could not be conQzaered because the i.morovements are nat yet in. It was 'Dointec3 out that existing homes on the street are set back 35f instead of 501. Mr. Oring stated that the neighbors ars in agrEement with S/L 212 and S/L 20g bu't that they have wome doubts on S;!L 206 and S/L 207. Ae reguested that each bE considered individuaITy. He cited the minutes of 4,/9/70 at which ti;ne Mr. Bauer state(i that no variance would be xeczuested an SA 212. He furthur stated -that there is a Daved road on this sublot and that it must lae removed. He sta.ted that the Homeownexs Association were nat in fwvor of 15" variances on 5A 206 and 207 but suggested that n'ossibTy a IOt variance should be grantPd on 207. Discussion -),Tas held. It was fe? t that uniforimity* o#' petback was i.mportant to the over ?11 apgearance of the wr•ea and that since there Were G.lready-houses set back 35' that aL af the ho?aes should. be the same c?istance back. Mr. Scheef moved ta grant a 15t var?ance on S/L 206; seconded by Mr. Tubbs and unani.mously oassed. Mr. T.tbbs moved to grant a. 151 vaxiance on S/L 207; seconc?ec1 by Mr. Scheei and unanimously passed. Mr. Tubba maved to rr?:nt a 151 variance an S/L 209-f secondea by Mr. Scheef and unanimously passed. Mr. Seheef r:ioved to grant a 15' variance on S/L 212; seconded by P-ir. Tubbs and unanimouFlty passed.