02/09/1971 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLAM??IT?G COM?TIS"ION (2/9/71) - Page 2 He spoke in favor of underground lineti and stated that the cost increase wa.s tirell within the ca.pa.bil.ities of CFI, (L,,) PQr, i3ess, 25427 Butternut R.idge R.oad stated that he had attenc?ed the meeting held in Brecysville on 1/1/./71 ^.nd st?ted that according to Glenn i4organy Solicitor of Maced.onia, 132,000 volt Zines cannot be run through a resirJ.ential area. (5) 14rs. Jensen, 25527 Butternut Ridge R.oad suggested loca+ing sub-station in a cormnercial area. (6) Mro Bald_i-rin, 25191 Butternut Ridge Road feels tha.t hioh tension lines through a resid.ential area are hazardous and suggested an alternate rovte tha.t woule?n't effect the people. (7) Mr. Iiill, 25407 Butternut Ricge Road objectec7 to height of poles, (g) Mr. Basil, Butter- nut Ridge Road ^.sked to loolc at sub-station plans, (9) Mr, Child.s, 5988 Colwnbia R.oad stated that he felt the voltage should be ta.ken d.own to 33 KV c-inc] cited corona. problem. He sta.ted furthur that he feels the lines shoulc? run rlong existing roads - not rroposed roads and that if the voltage is going to be kept hign, the lines should go underground, (10) Mrs. Ha, s, 25273 Butternut Ridge Road spoke against high tension lines and stated that -i)erhaps it was feasible to have more sub-stations and no high tension wires. (11) Bernard Schulz9 25655 Butternut R.idge R.oad stzted that he personally visited the Highway DePartment and that reloca.ted route 252 is so far down the list, that the road might never be built. He suggested loca.tion of the sub-st.^tion in the indus+rial area. Mr. Leonard askec CEI representatives why they couldn't consider location of the sub-station zn the present yndustrial ar.ea. 'Mr. Hayes of CEI stated that the need is not just in the west end - that the need is right here where the loa.d mus'u be lightened now. Other members of the Planning Commission asked CEI represent^tives ciuestions regarding any points that they wishecl elarified, Mr. Ledvina stated that the Planning Commission members muet eva.luate wha.t is for the good of the City as a whole and ad.ded that sometimes action must 'ne talcen to benefit the entire City even tnough it is contrary to some of the citizenst wishes. He added that the Cit,y haC no r?rovision for util.ities in their code. Mr. Byers moved to aprrove location of th.e CEI 132,000 volt line as nresented and to recomrnend rezoning of proposed sub-statian site to multiple residence. Mr. Richards seconded the motion. The motion passed with Mr. RTelson a.nd Mr. Leonard voting no. N1. New DeveloDments and Subc?ivisions - P3one VI. Co,nmunications (a) Building Department R.eports (b) Memo from ?,Ta.?Tor reo Brecksville meeting on 1/1l,/71 (c) -hnnouncement of ineeting of the Industrial Development Committee on 2/11/71. i'Ir, Davis wi11 attend the meeting. (d) Letter regarding State Rcute 611 feasibility study. Planning Comriission agrees that a study should be made of access road. VII. Committee Reports - None VIII. New Business (a) Bradle.y R.oad Culvert - Ransbury presented plan for public improvement o- countJ road (Bra.dley Road) and expla.ined that the County ha.s tagged this culvert as being in a very poor condition. The County Yri11 ra,y 3/4 of the cost which means that the City's cost w-ill be approximately >17, 500 including re-surfacing 300, of the roa.d. Discussion was held. It w,-as noted. tha.t the F-rea in c+uec-tion is iVE