Laserfiche WebLink
, <br />PIANNING CGNlNLLS52M P3ge -2 <br />IV. O1d Business <br />(a) 01.msted Ar•n.a - Mr, Rans'oury presented plansa Mr. Ransbiuy sta.ted <br />that the? sanitary f7.ow wi11 not go to the LeF3ern stationy but wi1l <br />go into tha trunk 1.ine on I.orain Rd, and then proceed South to the <br />treatment.plant. He also stated that there wou].d be several <br />alternatives for the storRn sewer. Qne would L-e a retentf.on basin <br />p1aced at the rear of 'uhe 7,ot. The other alternative would k:e to <br />have it pumped up fxont to the Lorain Road storm sewera Mro Brewer <br />tY:ought a retcntion basin wovld be a much better choiceo NLr, C?7.ayas <br />represented the builder, Mra Caster stated that he felt that the <br />buxden of the drainage and sanitary problems are up to the developer„ <br />He felt that there is much time and money spent investi,gating these <br />types of plans and it is up to the developer to solve these probyems <br />before presenting pZans to the Planning Conunissiono Mrn Ledvi.na <br />sa9.d that this was discussed at tr:e last meeting, Mr. Caster said <br />that we are not i.n the positi,on tfl design drainage plans of any <br />kind for developers, N`xo Ledqina suggested that this be pursued <br />further with the Engineering Department anci Council, Mr. Pavis <br />moved to reject the plan. St was seconded by Mr. Brewer and <br />unar.i.mously rejectedo <br />(b) O1.msted Manor - No information on th3.s mattero If the committee <br />does not hear from the cieveloper of G1.msted M.anor L-y the. next <br />meeting, they will consa.dex• the px°oject abandonede <br />(c ) Sandy Ridge #9, 10, 11, 12 - Mr. I,edvi.na read a letter from Council <br />unanimousZy approving the ],and as sucho Mr. Vincent represented <br />Sandy Ridge, `"he walkway was not considered this timep 'Lnstead <br />they added a new parcel of Iand known as the rear of Novak property, <br />and came up with a total of 4,94 acres, Mro Davis moved to approve <br />these planso 2t was seconded ty Mr. $yers and passed with Mr. <br />Richards voting no. <br />(d) North Olmsted Garden Estalues - Mr. 7-edvina read a letter from the <br />Law Cffice of Payer, Bleiwei:ss & Crow representi.ng Mr. A. G. <br />Rosenblum & John Antol, who tri.e3 to keep Mr. Reimer from going <br />before the Planning Commissiono Mr. Kitchen advi.sed Yx. Reimer <br />and his lawyer that the Ci+y is not a party to thi.s actiono <br />P1ans were presented for the 388 unit apartment }:uilding to be <br />1.ocated on Lorain and CQlumbia Road, Mr. Prvkasy stated that in <br />the ori.ginal proposal the resic:ents were advised that Mixed Use <br />cotlld be cor.sidered Lecause it gave the Ci.ty fairly tight control <br />in regard to zoningo The residents felt, wi-?h good reason, ?hat <br />the rezoni.ng was done with the i.ntent of producing a p1.an si.mi.lar <br />to what waS oxiginally presented and buildings that would not <br />exceed fi.ve stories. To grant the use would be J.ega1., but it <br />would Le breaking faith with the residentse Mr. West felt that <br />the residents should be inc].uded in any di.ecussion. Mro Ledvi,na <br />also fe1,t that there shoul.d Ite some communzcati.on with the people <br />before someth3.ng is done. Mro Ledvina moved to set up a joint <br />meeting wi.th the Build3.ng, Zoning and Development Cotmnittee, and <br />that they will arrange with the adjacent property owners and <br />other interested parties to attend a meeting Decemher 6. It was <br />seconded 1;y Nlr, Brewer and unanimously passed.