My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/05/1972 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1972
>
1972 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
01/05/1972 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:37:12 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 6:46:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1972
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/5/1972
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS - 1/5/72- Page 4 <br />9m Appellant: Assembly of God Church, 3874 Columbia Rdo - Request to build <br />an addition to existing church in residential district. Request is in <br />violation of Ord. #62-33, Section 1151.01 (E)9 which states in As B9 & <br />C Residence Districts land may be used and buildings or structures may <br />be designed, built, alterred, or used for (E) places of worship provided <br />there is issued by the Board a special permit for such use as provided in <br />Section 1133.12 of the Zoning Code. <br />Present: Mr, Don Rake, representative of the church, Mrso J. C. Baker' Norbert Fox. <br />All witnesses were sworn in. Mr. Rake presented pl.ansm Mrs. Baker inquired where a1,1 <br />the cars would be parked as they are now using Mr0 Ackroys's property. She would 1.ike <br />the easement taken off of Mr. Ackroyd°s propertya Tira Norbert Fox said that it has <br />become a lovers lane back there. A discussion was held. Mrm Roberts moved to grant <br />a specia1 request for the addition on the church; seconded by Ntr. Scheef and unanimously <br />approved. <br />10. Appellant: North 01.msted Board of Education - Request for variance (1133.13) <br />to erect 61 fence from the Midvale entrance to North 01.msted High School to <br />the southern point of Northern and from the northern point of Northern <br />Avenue to a point opposite the southern end of the Service Center of the <br />west prooerty 7ine of the SecondarTJ School site. Request is in violation <br />of Ord. #62-33, Section 1151.04, fence not to exceed 4t in height. <br />Present: Mrm Storch, representing the school, Mrs. Rose Udoods, Mr. Car1 Swick, Mr. Caster. <br />A11 witnesses taere sworn in. Mr. Roberts asked if the school is proposing a sidewalk <br />',here. He was told they are not. Mr. Storch said that the Board of Education does not <br />aant the fence closed off because it provides a paint of access. Mr. Roberts asked why <br />they want that open part. Nlr. Storch said it is strictly as a wa1.k in access at this <br />timee Mr. Car1 Swick9 wanted to know what vrould be the opposition of putting a gate <br />across. The gate could be opened..?.Mrs. E. Woods was in favor of the fencee but the <br />students will cut through her yard if the fence is not continuede Mr. Caster said <br />that this is a good start in the right direction. Mr. Storch said that people have <br />to spend money to protect their own property. Mr. Swick said the school is responsible <br />for creating the nuisanceo Mr. Roberts moved to continue the case next month9 with the <br />option that the School Board will make an endeavor to find out whether they want to <br />extend the fence over to Northern and extended to Butternut; seconded by Mro Scheef <br />and unanimously agreed. <br />The minutes of November 3, 1971 meeting were corrected to read 14' variance 3.nstead <br />of 61 on case Noo 1, Mr. Kelleya Minutes were approved as correcteda <br />The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 P.M. <br />/ ? - <br />Mar e Nader Secretar f,? ? • <br />? ? Y <br />illiam ubbs, Chairman
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.