09/08/2014 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• . she visited the site. Ms. Rudolph said she had no objections closing in the patio and although the lot is non-conforming, the yard appeared to have a sufficient amount of open space. Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Ms. Bellido, to grant App14-1808: William Healy of 26760 Ross Circle the following variances: 1. A 22 ft. rear yard variance for rear yard setback; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 28 ft., Section 1135.08 (a). Note: existing rear yard setback is 36ft. 2. A variance for one additional shed; code permits 1, applicant shows 2, section 1135.02 (d)(1). , 3. A 56 square foot variance for maximum allowable square footage of an accessory structure; code permits 120 sq. ft., applicant shows 176 sq. ft., section 1135.02 (b)(1). 4. A 227 square foot variance for exceeding 20% rear lot coverage; code allows 1171 sq. ft., applicant shows 1398 sq. ft., section 1135.02 (d)(3). Motion passed 5-0. Ms. Rudolph moved seconded by Ms. Bellido to grant App14-1808: William Healy of 26760 Ross Circle a special permit to add to a non-conforming building as existing home is 36 ft. from the rear property line, chapter 1165.02, which passed 5-0. ' App14-1821; Christopher Hartenstine; 23784 Vincent: Proposal consists of covering existing concrete patio. 1. A special permit to add to a non-conforming building is required; existing home is 45' from rear property line 1165.02. 2. A 17 foot variance for rear yard setback is required; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 33 ft., section 1135.08(a). The oath was administered to Mr. Hartenstine. He said he would like to put an awning over his existing patio. The condition of the old covering was such it needed to be replaced so a contractor was hired to remove it and when he.applied for the permit, it was denied due to the distance from the rear yard line. The distance will be 33 feet from the rear property line. The covering removed was a 20'x12' aluminum sheeting roof which was in poor condition due to age and buckling from inclement weather. The new roof will be the same dimensions however the roof material will be a translucent Lexan product which will withstand the weather. Mr. Russell said he had no objections to the request. Mr. Raig asked what abutted the applicant's property and Mr. Hartenstine said he abuts a Westlake drainage field. Mr. Raig said the abutting property is a drainage ditch therefore he had no objections. Mr. Raig moved, seconded by Ms. Rudolph, to grant App14-1821; Christopher Hartenstine of 23784 Vincent a 17 foot variance for rear yard setback; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 33 ft., section 1135.08(a), which passed 5-0. Ms. Rudolph moved, seconded by Ms. Bellido, to grant App14-1821; Christopher Hartenstine of 23784 Vincent a special permit to add to a non-conforming building as the existing home is 45' from rear property line 1165.02, which passed 5-0. 2