05/25/2016 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

plain shall balance, therefore an additional 250,078 cf beyond what is currently shown shall be removed from the flood plain 4. Stortnwater quality control shall be provided per city requirements. 5. Stormwater quantity control is required. To address the deficiencies in minimum required storage volume, and maximum allowable peak discharge rates currently proposed in the plans, the applicant shall reduce the peak discharge leaving the site by the excess 69 cfs. The 100-year flood water elevation within the site shall be reduced by four inches, or 248,000 cf of storm water storage shall be added to account for the excess peak flow for duration of one hour. 6. A consolidation plat shall be prepared combining the existing five separate parcels. 7. A conservation easement shall be prepared to protect the riparian setback. It shall be shown on the consolidation plat. 8. The proposed fence currently shown along Roots Ditch shall be removed from the riparian setback. 9.. A variance to 926.12 (LJses Prohibited in Riparian and Wetlands Setbacks) is recommended contingent upon the applicant incorporating permeable pavers and/or bioretention to address the new impervious surfaces within the flood plain and riparian setback, in accordance with 926.14. Mr. O'Malley agreed that the CUP should be addressed at this meeting. The property has been used as a school facility for decades so it likely meets the conditional use permit details, but the PDC is authorized to impose other conditions to it. The riparian setback variance is considered by City Council, not BZBA, although the PDC can make their recommendations in the same way they would be for BZBA. Mr. Smith thanked the staff for their willingness to work with the schools to do a phased design project. They are prepared to meet the conditions required by the Engineer even though it will increase cost for the project. Mr. Malone pointed out that most of the conditions given by Mr. DiFranco are requirements of the EPA for the City's NPDES stormwater permit or other state and federal agencies. Mr. Anderson was concerned about an agreement being in place for widening the roadways with the City. Mr. Smith stated that they will be coming back to get permission for the off-site ROW work that will be done according to the traffic study that will be submitted. Mr. Anderson questioned if the approved setback would be affected if the road is widened. Ms. Wenger clarified that all of the road improvements would be done within the existing right-of-way. The setbacks are measured from property lines and ROW lines so the changes would not change the distance between the setback and the face of the building. Mr. James Faia, 5935 Burns, was concerned about his property being acquired in the future by the school district. He also asked if his property would still be considered to be in the flood zone. Mr. DiFranco stated that the raising of the flood plain on the school property could affect the hoineowner's property but the City will be taking extra caution to ensure abutting properties are not adversely affected. Mr. Malone moved, seconded by Mr. Anderson, to approve a conditional use permit for 16- 5426; N.O. High SchooUMiddle School Complex; 27301 Butternut Ridge I2oad, with the