Laserfiche WebLink
16-7367; Taulant & Derveni Sako; 24993 Arlington Lane <br />Representatives: Jack Seagle, 537 Front Street, Berea, OH; Taulant Sako, Owner <br />Proposal consists of a garage extension. The property is zoned One Family Residence C. <br />The following variance is requested: <br />1. A 5 ft. variance for front yard setback; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 45 ft., Section <br />1135.06(a). <br />Mr. Aspery stated that the applicant is requesting a variance of 5 feet to allow for an addition on <br />to the front of their existing attached garage. The current front yard setback is 50 feet, whereas <br />the proposed addition would reduce this number to 45 feet. Code requires a rear yard setback of <br />no less than 50 feet. <br />Mr. Raig ensured that the owners gave Mr. Seagle permission to represent him at the meeting <br />and the owners were present at the meeting. Mr. Seagle stated that the owner would like to add <br />the man door to the front of the garage and increase the height of the garage to accommodate <br />their truck. Some usable square footage of the garage is lost due to steps in front of the man door. <br />Ms. Sabo clarified that the driveway will be replaced and added onto in order to access the front <br />of the house. Mr. Papotto pointed out that the garages in the neighborhood are a mix of front and <br />side load garages so the proposal would not look out of place. He was concerned that the <br />increased amount of concrete would not aesthetically go with the rest of the neighborhood, Ms. <br />Sabo agreed. Mr. Seagle believed the concrete at the front of the house would be more <br />aesthetically pleasing. Mr. Sako purchased the home in 2004 and the truck was purchased in <br />2014. Mr. Allain clarified that the driveway is not part of the variance. Mr. Allain believed the <br />proposal is reasonable and did not believe the driveway should affect the garage variance. Ms. <br />Meredith pointed out that the 5 feet added to the garage would seem like more since the front <br />yard is smaller. Ms. Sabo added that the garage door would be on the front of the garage instead <br />of the current window. Ms. Allain did not think the 5 feet would be noticeable once the project <br />was completed. <br />Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by 1VIr. Allain, to grant the following variance as written for <br />16-7367; Taulant & Derveni Sako; 24993 Arlington Lane: <br />1. A 5 ft. variance for front yard setback; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 45 ft., <br />Section 1135.06(a). <br />Motion passed 3-2,1VIs. Meredith and 1VIs. Sabo voted no. <br />16-7393; Arthur Malov; 3623 Hunter Drive <br />Representative: Arthur Maloy, Owner <br />Proposal consists of a deck. The property is zoned One Family Residence C. <br />The following variance is requested: <br />1. A 15 ft. 6 in. variance for rear yard setback; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 34 ft. 6 in., <br />Section 1135.08(a). <br />Mr. Aspery stated that the applicant is requesting a variance of 15.5 feet to allow for the addition <br />of a 13.5 foot by 31.75 foot deck to the rear of their existing home. The current rear yard setback