My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/22/2017 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2017
>
2017 Planning and Design Commission
>
03/22/2017 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:45:47 PM
Creation date
1/24/2019 8:51:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2017
Board Name
Planning & Design Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/22/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
located in the General Retail Business district. Mr. Anderson asked about the above ground frost- <br />proof yard hydrants. Ms. Pavlovic stated that there are drinking fountains by the pavilion and <br />stadium. Ms. Pavlovic stated that there would be no structures on the south end of the campus <br />but the fieldhouse by the stadium would have the permanent restrooms. The south side of the <br />property is in the flood zone so they decided not to put permanent structures there. Mr. Anderson <br />clarified that the press box has elevators for accessibility and suggested that there should be <br />accessible seating at the upper level also. Ms. Pavlovic stated that the press box accessibility is <br />required because of its size. There is accessible seating on the first row of the bleachers with <br />ramp accessibility. <br />Tom Phillips, 5533 Burns Road, questioned an ongoing problem regarding his property line with <br />the school. Part of his property was originally Northern Ave which was vacated and split <br />between his property and his neighbor's. The fence line on his property consists of a chain link <br />fence and wood fence. When the school did their survey, there is a foot and a half difference <br />between the fence line and property line. He was also concerned about the water issues if the <br />stadium is installed in the flood plain. He asked if the ball fields were included in the project. He <br />asked how trees growing into the fence would be addressed. <br />Tim Harbison, 5462 Revere Drive, was concerned about the pxoperty that was purchased by the <br />schools directly across from Dover Center Road. He believed that the green space was supposed <br />to be preserved with the purchase but the trees have since been cleared. He was concerned about <br />the Type of tree canopy that they can expect. He knew a fence would be installed but he would <br />like to see more trees installed to provide more shade. <br />Sue Ranker, 5526 Revere Drive, asked if a front door would be installed along Butternut Ridge <br />Road. She also asked about ingress and egress to the campus for cars and buses. She complained <br />about the snow plows and stated that activity is beginning at 6:00 a.m. She was concerned about <br />the amount of traffic on her street and being unable to make left hand turns from Revere Drive. <br />She suggested that westbound traffic go out at Burns Road and eastbound traffic go out at Revere <br />Drive and only make right-hand turns. She wanted an auxiliary policeman to direct traffic after <br />school. She wanted an entrance from Fitch Road also. She wanted a sound barrier fence installed <br />instead of the board on board fence. She asked if a barrier would be installed around the retention <br />basin. She suggested that the RTA buses have a stop in front of the school since students are not <br />bused. She was concerned about where parents would park if they were picking up their kids. <br />She was concerned about paramedics being able to access the street during school hours. She <br />liked the stadium but asked where the goal post, scoreboard, and flag would be located. <br />Andrew Votaw, 5593 Burns Road, wanted to know where the chain link and board and board <br />fences would be installed. He asked if the Burns Road sidewalk project was separate, which it is. <br />Dave Smith, 27346 Nantucket Drive, was concerned about the flood plain issues. He thought that <br />the retention pond should have a fence around it. He was concerned about asbestos issues when <br />the old school is demolished and whether the homes around it would be protected. He <br />appreciated what the City did to renovate the ditches by Revere but he wanted the ditch behind <br />their homes attended to also.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.