06/04/2018 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

three cars that would need to go in the garage and the existing garage would be used as the shed. Mr. Kozminski added that the attached garage is proposed to be larger than allow for stairs to lead from the garage directly into the basement. Mr. Bennett said the closest neighbor, Mr. Szabo, is in favor of the request. Mike Yunich, 24836 Kennedy Ridge Road, wanted to make sure that the proposed garage will not be used for commercial purposes. He was concerned that the garage location would be changed and the garage doors would face his property. Mr. Papotto said the attached garage is 126 square feet larger than what is allowed. He added that an accessory structure would be allowed on the property and it could be 350 square feet so the variance requested would only be an additiona180 square feet, therefor he did not oppose the request. Mr. Mackey stated that there are other properties in the area that have large accessory buildings and he has no objections to the existing garage remaining, especially since it is further back from the road. Mr. Rahm agreed and added that it would be a shame to remove the existing garage that is in decent shape. Mr. Allain pointed out that the Board would not be ruling on the placement of the garage doors. Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Mackey, to approve the following variance for 18- 10992; Daniel & Elizabeth Kozminski; 24857 Kennedy Ridge Road: 1. A 556 sq. ft. variance for total garage floor area; code permits 750 sq. ft., applicant shows 1,306 sq. ft., Section 1135.02(B)(1)(a). Motion passed 4-0. 18-11043; Nedal Hasan; 26470 Waterburv Circle Representatives: Nedal Hasan, owner Proposal consists of a patio enclosure in the rear yard. Property is zoned A-One Family Residence. The following variance is requested: l. An 8 sq. ft. variance for rear yard setback; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 42 ft., Section 1135.06(d). Mr. Aspery stated that the applicant is proposing to construct a new patio enclosure in the rear of their home. The dwelling's rear yard setback ranges from 64 feet to 47 feet, but the patio enclosure is shown to encroach into the required 50-foot setback by eight feet. The variance request should be amended to show an eight linear feet variance, not eight square feet. Mr. Hasan said that he is requesting to close in an existing deck. Mr. Papotto clarified with Mr. Russell that part of the home is within the rear yard setback due to the pie-shaped lot. Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Mackey, to approve the following variance as amended for 18-11043; Nedal Hassan; 26470 Waterbury Circle: 1. An 8 ft. variance foa- rear yard setback; code requires 50 ft., applicant shows 42 ft., Section 1135.06(d). 1Vlotion passed 4-0. 18-11139; Cassandra & Amanda Spuhler; 6368 Hastings Drive