Laserfiche WebLink
material and may be better off painted. Ms. Egan-Reeves clarified with the applicant that the <br />lattice at the side of the porch will be removed. Mr. Schumann asked that the gables, decorative <br />rafter ends and brackets be restored. Ms. Clay said the elements would remain but would be <br />painted white. The applicant said the garage door and front door will be white. Mr. Dubowski <br />asked if the bricks will need to be replaced prior to painting. Ms. Clay stated that the masonry <br />professional would be able to fix the bricks prior to painting. Ms. Cardarelli asked that the <br />sandstone caps on top of the brick not be painted. <br />Mr. Schumann moved, seconded by Mr. Dubowski, to approve the Certificate of <br />Appropriateness for renovations including roof, paint and windows for 18-11296; <br />Havannah Property Management, LLC; 27370 Butternut Ridge Road with the following <br />conditions: <br />1. The attic window, east side front window ancl porch window are to remain the same <br />style as they are now; <br />2. The garden window on driveway shoulcl be replaced with something similar to the front <br />windows; <br />3. The brick on the front porch pillars is to be saved and repaired and may be painteci <br />gray; <br />4. The sandstone caps on tlae brick pillars of the poreh are not to be painted; <br />5. The gables, rafter ends and brackets are to be repaired or replaced with copies; and <br />6. The garage door and side door to the home would be as shown in submitted pietures. <br />Motion passed 6-0. <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br />Chapter 165/111storic District Map iJpdates <br />Ms. Lieber reviewed the proposed updates. The ordinance approving the Butternut Ridge historic <br />district did not have a map attached and there is no gvidance in the code for updating the district <br />map. Some of the historic homes have been moved or demolished since the district was created. <br />Ms. Lieber reviewed the proposed changes to Chapter 165 which included removing unnecessary <br />definitions, restructuring the chapter to make it more straightforward, designating landmarks and <br />districts is now similar, creating new language for amending districts, creating one process for <br />altering landmarks and properties in a landmarks district, identifying the application process, <br />exemptions are included where applicable instead of at the end of the chapter, some exemptions <br />were formerly minor changes (ex: rear yard and not visible from ROW), adding a review process <br />section, adding an appeals section, and separating out determinations for appropriateness for <br />construction versus demolition. She wanted property owners who would be added to or removed <br />from the district to be notified in a similar manner to those when a district is created. She <br />suggested shortened the design guidelines section to allow the Commission to adopt them <br />separately from the ordinance. The current design guidelines do not provide much guidance <br />regarding alterations and renovations, which is most of what the Commission reviews. She <br />would like the changes to go to Council for approval in August. Mr. Schumann added that all of <br />the changes to the ordinances and the district map would need to go to Council for approval. Mr. <br />Morse asked about projects done to the back of a builling if it is not visible from the right-of- <br />way and how corner properties would be handled. Ms. Cardarelli pointed out that when a district