04/07/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

' A 10 foot variance for side yard setback, for a driveway too close to non-residential property line, (code requires 10', applicant shows 0'). Which is in violation of 90-125, Section (1139.07). Note: Any section which encroaches over property line must be removed. Mr. Yund, representing the owner, and neighbors; Mrs. Whitback and Mr. Jablonski each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. Conway indicated that the auto wash was created prior to the current codes. The driveway ran along the property line which was allowed. When they replaced the driveway, an ex-inspector gave the owner permission to extend the driveway further back. It was not brought to his attention until an abutting neighbor filed a complaint and it was found that the pavement was over the neighbor's properiy line. What was there prior to the current code is not an issue and the board only needs to rule on the small section which was added. He questioned if the applicant had removed the encroaching concrete. Mr. Yund stated that the encroaching concrcte was in fact, cut and removed. Mr. Conway questioned if the concrete was pitched in order to handle the runoff. Mr. Yund reviewed that it was not their intent to go against cu.rrent zoning code or encroach onto the neighbor's property. They will reStore the neighbars green space and ensured that the cement was pitched correctly. The additional concrete was required due to a.n increase in business. The applicant needs the room to stack the cars on the site so the cazs do not spill out onto the street. Ms. Whitback indicated that the cleanliness of the site had been better. Mr. Jablaonski was concerned about the rear area however, looking at the plans it would not affect him. N. Sergi moved to grant Andy's Auto Wash of 28800 Lorain Road their reqnest for variance (1123.12), which consists of a driveway expansion and that the following variance is granted: 1). A 10-foot variance for side yard setback, for a driveway too close to non- residential property line, (code requires 10', applicant shows 0'). Wluch is in violation of 90.125, Section (1139:07). Note: Any section which encroaches over property line must be removed. M. Diver seconded the motion, which was unanimousty approved. 5. Developers Diversified; 26437 Brookpark Road: (W1tD 4) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of new ground signs The following variances are requested: 1. A variance for ground sign #4 within 35 foot line of sight, (code does not permit, applicant shows 1), section (1136.17 (A)). 2. A variance fdr ground sign #5 within the 35 foot line of sight, (code does not permit, applicant shows 1), section (1163.17 (A)). 3. A variances for 4 ground signs on a lot, (code permits 2, applicant shows 4), section (1163.26 (A))• 4. A 27 square foot variance for a ground sign larger than code permits (sign #1), (code pennits 50 sq', applicant shows 77 sq'), section (1163.26 (C)). 5. A 27 square foot variance for a ground sign larger than code pennits (sign #3), (code pennits 50 sq', applicant shows 77 sq'), section (1163.26 (C)). 6. A 13 square foot variance for a ground sign larger than code permits (sign #4), (code pennits 50 sq', applicant shows 63 sc}'), section (1163.26 (C)). 7. A 13 square foot variance for a ground sign larger than code permits (sign #5), (code pennits 50 sq', applicant shows 63 sq'), section (1163.26 (C)). 8. A variance for 3 ground signs (#2, 6, & 7) located on another lot (ma11 Property), (code does not permit, applicant shows 3), section (1163.29). 9. A 27 square foot variance for a ground sign larger than code permits (sign #2 on mall prop.), (code pennits 50 sq', applicant shows 77 sq'), section (1163.26 (C)). 3