|
3. A 20 foot variance for minimum width of a lot in Resident Disttrict B, (code requires
<br />701, applicant shows 501), secNon (1135.05 (Al)).
<br />4. A 4519 square foot variance for minimum square area of lot in Resident District B,
<br />(code requires 10850 sq ft, applicant shows 6331 sq ft), section (1135.05 (Al)).
<br />5. An S foot 4 inch variance for miniffiuffi depth of lot in Re.sident I)isstrkt B, (code
<br />requires 135', applicant shows 126.6'), section (1135.05 (A3)).
<br />Which is in violatioa? of 90-125, Sections (1135a45 (A)), (11235003 (B)), (1135.05 (AI)), and
<br />(1135.05 (A3)). W. Kremzar seconded the motion, roll call on ghe motion; J. Maloney, W.
<br />Kremzar, T. Kelly "yes" anai N. Sergi, M. Divee "no". Variances Granted.
<br />7. Mr. DasfflMta; 5712 Burns Road: (WRD 3)
<br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of adding an enclosure on rear deck.
<br />The following variances are requested;
<br />• A special permit to add to a non-confornung buiiding (1165.02), the existing residence is 38
<br />feet from rear property line, and code requires 50 foot.
<br />1. A 24 foot variance for a dwelling to close to rear property line, (code requires 50', applicant
<br />shows 26'), section (1135.08 (A)).
<br />Which is in violation of 90-125, Sections (1165.02) and (1135.08 (A)).
<br />Mr. & Mrs. Dasgupta the owners, Ms. Elkhatib,lVls. Veith, and Ms. Veith's daughter abutting
<br />neighbors each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. Dasgupta indica.ted
<br />that he wanted to turn the existing deck into a three season room. Mps. Sergi asked why the
<br />enclosure was needed. Nir. Dasgupta indicated that he studies in the morning and needs proper
<br />lighting and by closing the deck in he could properly see and somewhat be protected from the
<br />weather. He may widen the rneasurement but it would be no longer than what the deck
<br />currently is now. Mr. O'Malley reviewed that the iot is existing as was with the first case. AIl
<br />neighbors present were concerned that a deck woutd be added to the back of the addition. Mr.
<br />Dasgupta stated that he would not be replacing the deck. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated fbat the
<br />architect would have to submit more detailed informnation when they come in to apply for the
<br />pernut.
<br />W. Kremzar moveti to grant Mr. Dasgapta of 5712 Burns Rosd his request for variance
<br />(1123.12), which consists o#' adding an enclosure on rear deck and that the following
<br />variances are granted: *A special permit to add to a non-conforming bnilding (1165s02),
<br />the existing residence is 38 feet from rear property line, and code requires 50 foot. 1. A
<br />24 foot variance for a dwellmg to close to rear propertp lme, (code reqaires 50', applicant
<br />shows 26'), section (1135.08 (A)). Wlaich is in vaolation of 90-125, Seetions (1165.02) and
<br />(1135.08 (A)). J. Maloney seconded the motion, which was unaniYnously approved.
<br />8. C& C Realtv; 27932 Lorsin Road: (WRD 1)
<br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of site development.
<br />The following variances are reqr.ested:
<br />1. A use variance for allowing pazking & storage of vehicles for a car deaiership on
<br />residentially zoned land, (code permits none, applicant shows parldng), section (1123.12).
<br />2. A 13 foot variance for parking setback along I,orain Road, (code requires 20', applicant
<br />shows 7'), section (1139A7) (tabte).
<br />3. A 5 foot variance for parking setback along Dewey Road, (code requires 20', applicant
<br />shows 15'), section (1139.07) (table).
<br />4. A 10 foot variance for parking setback along north property line, (code requires 20',
<br />applicant shows 10'), section (1139.07) (table).
<br />6of15
|