09/01/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1. A 1000 square foot variance for an accessory storage building larger than code permits, (code permits 200 sq ft, applicant shows, 1200 sq ft), section (1135.02 (D1)). 2. A 5 foot variance for height of accessory struciure, (code permits 12 ft, applicant shows 17 ft), section (1135.02 (D3)). VVhich is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections; (1135.02 (D1)) and (1135.02 (D3)). 1Vdr. Scrivens the Owner and.Mr. Nlorad a neighbox each came forward to be swom in and address the request. Mr. Scrivens indicated that he is a member of the archery club and he would like to place his boat in the shed and the shed that is there now is sinking and there is no room for his tools. The shed would be rernoved and he would like to have a work shop. The downspouts that are required to be placed on the shed would be tied into a drain in the ya.rd. Nir. Marad indicated that he has made a lot of changes to the home. 1VIr. Rymarczyk indicated that the size is quite large and the height is larger than what code allows. Mr. Scrivens indicated that a 10 foot opening requires a 2 foot clearance for the door and trusses. 1VIrs. Sergi indicated that the property is quite large and there are trees that would hide the shed. She asked if the use of the shed would be used for any type of business. Mr. Scrivens sta.ted that he would not be using the shed for a business. Mr. Rymarczyk asked if there would be any vehicles parked in the shed. Mr. Scrivens indicated that at some time in the future he may place a driveway. N. Sergi movecl to grant Rick Scrivens of 5560 Colvambia Road lnis request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a new storage building and that the following variances are granted: 1. A 1000 square foot eariance for an accessory storage building larger than code permits, (code permits 200 sq ft, applicant shows,1200 sq ft), section (1135.02 (D1)). 2. A 5 foot variance for height of accessory structure, (code permits 12 ft, applicant shows 17 ft), section (1135.02 (D3)). VVhich is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections; (1135.02 (Dl)) and (1135.02 (D3)). W. Kremzar seconded the motion, roll call on the motion; J. Maloney, T. Kelly, N. Seagi "yes" and M. Davet°, W. Kremzar "no" Variances Granted. W. Kremzar and M. Diver felt the size of the building was excessive. J. Maloney felt that due to the size of the yard the size of the building was acceptable. 6. John 1VIcClachertv; 29600 Stewart Drive: (WRD 3) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new fence. The following variances are requested: 1. A 20 foot variance for a 6 foot fence located in side yard setback on a corner lot, (code does not allow, applicant shows a fence). 2. A variance for a fence in required side yard setback less than 50% open, (code requires 50% open, applicant shows solid). 3. A 42 inch variance for a fence higher than 30 inches in required side yard on a corner lot, (code pertnits 30", applicant shows 72"). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (F1)). Mr. McClacherty the owner came forward to be swoxn in and address the request. Mr. McClacherty indicated that at 8:00 pm the amount of traffic increases and headlights from the cars shine into their windows so they would like to have a shadowbox type fence to block or decrease the lights. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that a shadow box fence is not 50% open. _ W. McClacherty indicated that if the fence was placed to code it would be plaeed half way in his backyard. The split rail fence that is there would be left from the house to the front yard. He would place the fence far enough (2-feet) from the sidewalk to run the lawnmower along the fence. The 7of10