11/03/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

not be required. The applicants meet the setback and the sideyard is cleared and the request is strictly based on the orienta.tion of the house to the rear. T'he board asked why a 6-foot fence was chosen. The applicants felt that the children and dog could climb over a 4 foot fence. If the fence was 50% open the dog and children could squeeze through the openings. The board did not feel that the fence would have an adverse impact on neighboring sites or traffic. The variances are not substantial nor does it affect the overall appearance of the neighborhood. W. Kremzar moved to grant Mr. & Mrs. William Plank of 4589 Columbia Road tbeir request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a new fence and that the following variances are granted: 1. A 25 foot vapiance for a 6' privacy fence located in a neighbors 50' setback on a corner lot, (code requires 501, applicant shows 25'), section (1135.02 (fZ)). 2. A 42 inch variance for a fence higher fhan code allows on a corner lot in a 50' neighbors setback, (code permits 30", applicamt shows 72"), section (1135.02 (fl)). 3. A variance for a fence less than 50°/a open on a corner lot in a neiglabors 50' setback, (code requires 50% open, applicant shows solid), section (1135.02 (fl)). 4. An 11 foot variance for a fence (dog run) located in a neighbors 50' setback on a corner lot, (code requires 50', applicant shows 39'), section. (1.135.02 (f2)) (see note). 5. An 18 inch variance for a fence higher than code allows on acorner lot in a neighbors 50' setback, (code requires 30", applicant shows 487), section (1135.02 (fl)) (see note). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (fl)) and 1135.02 (f2)). M. IDiver seconded the motion which was unanfmously approved. Variances Granted. 3. Mark McCollaugh; 23820 Lorain Itoad: (WRD # 2) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a storage shed. The following variances are requested: 1). A 1,400 square foot variance for a storage building larger than code allows, (code permits 200 sq ft, applicant shows 1,600 sq ft), section (1135.02 (D 1)). 2). A 1 foot 4 inch variance for an accessory structure higher than code a.llows, (code permits 12', applicant shows 13' 4"), section (1135.02 (D3)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (D1)) and (1135.02 (133)). Note: See Building Commissioners letter dated 10/26/05. Mr. Pyles, a friend of the applicant came forward to be swom in and address the request. Mr. O'Ma11ey advised that unless the gentleman was the applicant's attorney or contraetor he could not address the board on the matter and the matter should be tabled. He apologized to the neighbor who was present and advised that without the applicant present the matter could not be addressed. J. Maloney moved table Mark McCollaugh of 23820 Lorain Road until lDecember 1, 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting as the applacant was not presenta N. Sergi seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. 4. Red Lobster 25615 Brooknark Road: (WRD #4) Request for variance (1123.12). T'he proposal consists of sign package. The following variances are requested: 1). A variance for more than 1 wall sign on a building, (code pernuts 1, applicant shows 3), section (1163.27 (A)). 2). A 40 square foot variance for a flag larger than code permits, (code permits 20 sq ft, . applicant shows 60 sq ft), section (1163.32 (E)). 3). A 1 foot variance for a flag wider tlgan code permits, (code permits 5', applicant shows 6' wide), section (1163.32 (E)). 6of7