11/03/2005 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4). A 5 foot variance for a flag larger than code permits, (code permits 5', applicant shows 10' long), section (1163.32 (E)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1163.27 (A)) and (116332 (E)). Note: Planning Commission recommendations: 1). Eliminate, raceways for Red Lobster signs. 2). I)ecrease size of flag if possible. Ms. Nunn, the Authorized agent for Red Lobster came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Ms. Nunn advised that the flag variances were being withdrawn as the flags would meet city codes. The only variance is to have three wall signs. The building is located more than 130 feet ftom the edge of the right of way and will have no ground signs and the total size of a11 signs are less than what is allowed for one wall sign and only two of the signs would be illuminated. The 37.18 square foot sign facing Brookpazk road would be illuminated and the sign facing east would also be 37.18 square foot and illuminated. The logo is 16 square foot and not illuminated but would have a wall pack shining onto it. Any window graphics will be in accordance to city codes and are not illuminated and are a decal not really signage. Mr. O'Malley advised that the 1'lanning Commission recommended the applicants request be approved due to the style and other planning considerations. He recomrnended the same restrictions be placed on the restaurant as was for Target. Ms. IVunn asked that they be allowed to place a banner for open positions and once hiYiaig is completed would never have a banner again. Mr. Conway advised that the banner should be addressed now so the applicant does not have to return. They could be given a variance for 30 days to have a banner for hiring purposes. Mr. Conway advised that the applicant did a good job limiting the size of the signs. J. Maloney moved to grant lted Lobster of 25615 Brookpark Road their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a sign paekage and that the following van'ances are granted as aimended: 1). A variance for more than 1 wall sign on a buflding, (code permits 1, applicant shows 3), section (1163.27 (A)). 2). A variance for a banner sign for 30 days while hiring prior is takang place. Which is in violataon of Ord. 90-125 sections (1163.27 (A)). Variances are contingent upon mo additional wall signs, banner signs, temporary signs, sandwich boards, billboards, window sale signs or lawn signs be used oa- requested. N. Sergi seconded.the motion whicb was unanimously approved. IV. COMMUNICATION: • Board of Zoning Appeals review of proposed Rules of Procedures: The board advised that the changes reflected what was requested. Mr. O'Malley advised that a memo should be included with the forms when sent to council. Forms :should be used for every case and once findings are signed would be final. He advised that there could be slight changes to the finding sheets but he would work with the clerk to make sure they meet all code requirements. The board requested the clerk sta.rt using forms at the December meeting. V. ADJOiJRN1VIENT: With no further business pending Chairman Maloney adjourned the meeting at 10;00 pm. I 2-1j /, Chairman f Date: /Donna Rote Clerk of Commissions 7of7