Annual Report - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 2005 REPORT "no", with the following comments; the property can be used and yield a reasonable return without the variance. The variance requested is substantial and the character of the neighborhood would be altered, but the variance would not adversely affect the delivery of governmental services. It is assumed that the land conformed to code when purchased but zoning requirements had changed and the owners predicament can be precluded by constructing a smaller room. Although she likes the look of the room it does not meet the 7 requirements for granting a variance. W. Kremzar "no" for the same reasons as Mr. Diver and the fact that the building is already non-conforming and the proposal is to increase the non-conformity further. J. Maloney "no" the room size is encroaching the rear to much as the room is enlarging the non-conformity. Variance Unanimously Denied 7/7/05 Mr. Parikh requested something in writing as to why he was denied. The clerk advised that he was welcome to a copy of the minutes once they were transcribed. Bryan & Janice Tench; 24357 Woodmere Drive: (WRD 2) W. Kremzar moved to grant Bryan & Janice Tench of 24357 Woodmere Drive their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a pool and that the following variance is granted: 1. A 161 square foot variance for swimming pool in rear yard, (code permits 728 sq ft, applicant shows 889 sq ft(garage, deck & pool). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d2)). J. Maloney seconded the motion, roll call on the motion; W. Kremzar "no" the variance was substantial and a smaller pool is available. M. Diver "no" she wished a smaller pool was available to the applicants and wished contractors would advise their clients to check with their City before purchasing a pool so residents would not have to go through the variance process. J. Maloney "no". Variance Denied 7/7/05 C& C Realty; 27932 Lorain Road: (WRD 1) J. Maloney moved to reconsider C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for their variance requests from June 2, 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting numbers #3, #4, and #6 which were denied be reconsidered. W. Kremzar seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. During roll call of the motion W. Kremzar stated it was difficult not having an opportunity to read what was submitted therefore out of a courtesy to the applicant he would be for the reconsideration. M. Diver concurred with Mr. Kremzar's comment and hoped the applicant would stick to his word and show the board something different. Reconsideration Granted 7/7/05 W. Kremzar moved to table C& C Realty of 27932 Lorain Road their request for a use variance to the August 4, 2005 Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. J. Maloney seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. 7/7/05 B.A.D. Bovs Ltd; 28597 Lorain Road: (WRD 3) W. Kremzar moved to grant B.A.D. Boys Ltd of 28597 Lorain Road their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a new development and that the following variances are granted as amended: 1. A 60 foot variance for minimum distance from residential property line to luminaries, (code requires 180 ft, applicant shows 120 ft), section (1161.12 (E)). 2. A.1 foot candle variance for minimum foot candle in a parking lot, (code requires .1 minimum, applicant shows .0), section (1161.12 (C) Table). Which is in violation of 90-125, Sections (1161.12 (E)), (1161.12 (C)Table). M. Diver seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. Variances Granted 7/7/05 Michael Murray; 26817 Sudbury Drive: (WRD 1) W. Kremzar moved to grant Michael Murray of 26817 Sudbury Drive his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a storage shed and that the following variance is granted: 1. A 35 11