Laserfiche WebLink
After a significant amount of time was spent at a previous meeting discussing an eight foot gap <br />on Dewey and Porter Roads, he asked why the Commission decided ahead of time that there <br />would be no mound along residential property on Porter Road. This was done prior to hearing <br />any comments by residents. He felt that this should have warranted considerate discussion. <br />even though the Commission has made efforts in an attempt to lessen the impact of operations <br />as maintenance, noise, unloading and such on residential properties. However, if past behavior is <br />to be an indicator, violations should be expected. He indicated that they have been told to report <br />and document certain violations with the City administration and the law enforcement. They <br />have been assured by the applicant that the concerns are groundless and such things would not <br />happen. To sum it up, he is aware that the Commission is the entity that has the power to <br />stipulate conditions to the permits that the applicant will listen to. He would like the following <br />three conditions to be added to the motion. <br />1) The applicant must never rezone parce1208 or attempt to purchase any other parcels north of <br />their north property line between Dewey and Porter Roads or any parcels on the east side of <br />Porter Road or on the west side of Dewey Road. <br />2) The applicant must agree to build a mound, similar to the mound on Dewey Road along the <br />south property line of the Hatton property. The mound would have a wooden fence and <br />sound deadening vegetation. <br />3) The applicant must agree in writing to comply with all ordinances at all levels of <br />government, with the understanding that violations of ordinances will be prosecuted. <br />W. Spalding moved to table Halleen Kia proposal with the provision that the applicant <br />prepare a full landscaping plan as described as a separate document. This should <br />incorporate the City Forester's recommendations so it can be evaluated. Also, with a <br />provision that you provide a lot consolidation plan showing all the lots between Dewey and <br />Porter Roads that are owned and the lots tliat are contiguous to it. J. Lasko seconded the <br />motion, which was unanimously approved. <br />Lot Split & Consolidation Plat for Permanent Parcel No. - 234-23-010 and 234-23-013 <br />Stearns Road (WRD 3): <br />The proposal is to split Permanent Parcel Number 234-23-013 (3.0912 acres) into two parcels. <br />The split parcel fronting Stearns Road will be 0.4299 acre, and the remainder parcel will be <br />2.6613 acres. The remainder parcel will be consolidated with Permanent Parcel Number <br />234-23-010. The consolidated parcel will be 5.6468 acres. The location is on the east side of <br />Stearns Road and approximately 500 eet south, of i1`TTnterstate 480; ,, Zoning is B, Residence, <br />,, ? <br />Single. ` <br />The following report dated March 22nd Ms. Wenger was read by Mr. Spalding. The input is <br />based upon information Ms. Wenger had available at the time of the report. <br />The purpose of the lot split and consolidation is to create a single parcel for the development of a <br />single family residential subdivision (cul-de-sac) with access onto Stearns Road. <br />5 <br />,. ; ,?