06/15/2006 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Kondozer believed that the proposed use and location of the storage area was the best location for Yhe use. Photos of the neighboring property were passed out which showed mobile semi storage containers visible from the driveway. 1VIr. Schmidt reviewed that he had looked at removing the last three sections of building wuts and moving them forward to the west of the existimg storage units. Thereby creating space needed to place the outdoor storage a.rea aflong the entire rear of the site a.nci would rneet a.ll City code requirements bur be very visible to I-480. Mrs, Sabo a.dvised that the applicant would no longer require a variance if placed as suggested. Mr. D. Conway reviewed with Mr. Schmidt his alternate plan and advised that t11e proposal would not require a variance but wou.ld have to return to the Planning & Design Cornmission for approval, Mr. Engoglia advised the applicant that the board did not want to make things difficult for hirn but it is up to their board to uphold City Codes. Mr. Schmidt reviewed that he was not aware of the situation until after he received approval otlierwise he would have addressed the ma4ter earlier in the process. If required he would place tlge outdoor storage area along the entire length of the rear property however the vehicles would then be visible to I-480. 1Vir. Engoglia advised that that being the case Mr. Schmidt would no longer require a variance. Board members voiced that they felt the site was a well eons9ructed site and 1VIr. Scbtnidt was doing a good job developing it. Mr. Engoglia questioned if the applicant wished to withdraw lus request or have the board act on the variance requested. Mr. Conway advised that al#hough the applicant wouid not require a varianee the chaaages need to be reviewed by the Planning & Design Commission. Mr. Kondozer advised his client to request the boazd act on the variance requested. M. Conway moved tm ga°ant 12a1e & Sheala Schmidt of 31399 Inalustrial Pkwy their request which consists of dewelopment pians fop pads to park recreatian vehicles at Exit 2 $tomge and the following vargamce as gnnte[?m 1. A variance fronx beang required to store boats and recreational vehflcles ian rear yard only, which is in violation of sectdone (1363.07 (b) (2) (E). D. Sabo secondeai the motion which vvas unanamously denied. VI. C0N1IMIiJNYCATION: Buiiding Departinents April & 1Vday 2006 finaneial report were subanitted. V. AI)JOiJRNMEN'P: With no firther business pending Chairman Engoglia adjourned the meeting at 6:50 pm. Ski; ?o L ? l Zd1/a.01- ,n16okliaXhairxman l;' DaYe: onna Rote erk of Coman?ssions