10/11/2006 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

parcels the owner's taxes would not be affected. Ms. Wenger said currently residential homes in the axea are non-conforming, which could be a challenge to resale because of non- conforming provisions. However under the new zoning owners can add onto their homes or sell their homes for residential use or office uses. So the selling value would ultimately depend on what use the land is being sold for. J. Lasko moved to recommend Council adopt Ordinance No. 2006-164 which is an ordinance providing for the amendment of the Zone Map of the City of North Olmsted by rezoning permanent parcel numbers 233-06-001, 233-06-002, 233-06-0039 233-06-004, 233-06-005, 233-06-006, 233-06-007, 233-06-008, 233-06-009, 233-06-010, 233-06-011, 233-06-012, 233-06-015, 233-06-016, 233-06-017, 233-06-018, 233-06-019, 233-06- 020, 233-06-021, 233-07-002, 233-07-003, 233-07-009, 233-07-025, 233-07-028, 234-05-004 and 234-06-006, located in the Barton-Bradley Roads area, from their respective current zoning classifications of limited industrial, miaced use single family residence and/or multiple residence, some which are split-zoned, to the new residential office district classification. R. Bohlmann seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. Ms. Wenger advised the audience members that there would be a Council meeting regarding the ordinance and notices would be sent out again by the clerk of council and placed in the local newspaper. Mr. Lasko advised that the minutes would be forwarded to City Council as their commission is only the first step in the review process. He also noted that members of city council were present Mrs. Dailey-Jones and Mr. Barker both of which heard the concerns and questions that were raised. VI. COMMUNICATIONS: • Ordinance No 2006-162: An ordinance amending chapter 1118 of the Zoning Code in order to update and change the procedure for granting and revoking conditional use permits. Ms. Wenger reported that at the last meeting discussions covered the current conditional use pertnit process and how recommended changes came about. As the city deals with different types of developments and zoning districts the city struggles to try to find standards that deal with all scenarios. Her recommendations were in conjunction with input from the zoning advisory committee as to how the city could modify the conditional use permit requirements in order to increase clarity, to address more types of uses and also include a revocation procedure so that if it is determined that a conditional use permit was granted under misinformation or conditions had changed, then the city could review the permit and in fact give City Council the means to revoke a permit if needed. There were two recommended changes from the last meeting which were added. The first, 1118.03(G)(9), was added to ensure the Planning & Design Commission would not be limited in their ability to place conditions on the permit. The second pertained to temporary structures and that has been removed from the section. They should be more regulated in a section exclusively for temporary structures, which she is now working on for the zoning committee to review. Currently under the business sections of the codes there are provisions for developments that want to have a temporary trailer while the construction is taking place'and doesn't go any further than that. However she would like to see the regulations cover things such as structures for holiday or seasonal events which take place and require temporary structures. The chapter would be designed so that temporary structures could be handled 5