01/24/2006 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

J. Lasko moved to approve the amendment of plans for Boss Office Park of 28900 Lorain Road in order to eliminate the required fencing across the north property line wrapping around the west and east property lines. M. Yager seconded the motion. Roll call: M. Yager, J. Cotner, G. Malone - yes; J. Lasko, M. Meredith - no. Motion Passed. J. Lasko moved to approve the development plan for Boss Office Park of 28900 Lorain Road, with the following findings and recommendations: The proposed lights ai•e decorative non-essential lighting. The concrete dumpster enclosure will be a sandblasted heavy aggregated concrete but dyed to match the exterior color of the buildings. M. Yager seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. North Olmsted Laser Carwash, 25054 Lorain Rd: (WRD 4) Proposal consists of constructing a new 2-bay automatic laser car wash. Note: Plannir.ig Commission tabled the proposal on 09/27/05 & 11/22/05. The Architectural Review Board reviewed the proposal on 11/16/05. Board of Zoning Appeals granted and denied a number of variances 1/12/06. Ms. Wenger reviewed that BZA granted variances for front building setback, building too close to a church, and signage variances. However, the Board denied variances for front parking setback and drive radius. Applicants withdrew all variance requests pertaining to lighting issues as it is their intent comply to code. The applicant made revisions to their plans consistent wi-th the variances granted and denied. Previously, the ARB and Planning Commission made a number of requests for plan amendments and additional information. Most issues have been addressed however, noise impact information was received prior to the start of the meeting therefore she could not report on the issue. Current site plans show landscaping on the rear of the property and she questions if in fact tlie trees are the applicants or belong to the neighboring property. She recommended the commission include provisions to prevent any future vacuum islands or outdoor vending machines on the site as there was not adequate space for such activities and to prevent adverse impacts associated with noise. Ms. Becker indicated that the current plans showed the 25-foot apron radius correctly. Tlze Engineering Department still needed construction details, detailed improvement plans including a demolition, utility, grading, and erosion control plans. Also storm water management calculations and all utilities must be underground in accordance to City Codified Ordinances section 929.04. Mr. O'Malley reviewed that BZA did not impose any restrictions pertaining to hours of operations in their motions. Furthermore he would not recommend any restrictions pertaining to hours of operation, as Business Regulations stand on their own and are of a nature of legislative changes at any time. He advised the commission that once developmental requests are made and a developer states they will accommodate those requests then new plans should be submitted which reflect the recommendations agreed upon. However in this case the applicants although verbally agreed to a brick wall has refused to show the wall in their new plans, which indicat:es their unwillingness to accommodate the commissions' request. Therefore the commission needs to go through the check list in section 1126 pertaining to the determination of significant adverse impacts and list those specific findings in a written report to BZD stating the findings related to 5