04/06/2006 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I. A 3%z foot variance for a fence higher than code allows on a corner lot within neighbors 50' setback, (code permits 30" applicant show 61), section (1135.02 (Fl)). 2. A variance for a fence less than 50% open on a corner lot within neighbors 50' setback, (code requires 50% open, applicant shows solid with lattice top), section (1135.02 (Fl)). 3. A 49 foot variance for a fence higher than 30" and less than 50% open with a neighbors 50' setback, (code does not permit, applicant shows 491), section (1135.02 (F2)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (Fl)) and (1135.02 (F2)). T. Kelly seconded the motion which was unanimously denied. Variance Denied Mr. O'Malley recommended the board issue a findings & order form in support of the decision rendered. 3. Dominic I'annitte; 24149 Carla Lane: (WRD #2) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a 3 season room. The following variance is required: 1. A 9 foot variance for a residence to close to the rear property line, (code requires 50', applicant shows 41'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.08 (A)). Note: 3-season room is to replace existing covered porch. Mr. Wagner with Wagner Home Improvements came forward to be sworn in and address his clierits' request. Mr. Wagner indicated that they are replacing the existing enclosed porch with a three season room to update the appearance and better tie into the existing home. The new room will be the exact size as the existing covered porch but will have footers and a concrete slab. There will be no heating or cooling in the enclosure and the rear yard is thick with trees. Board members had no objections to replacing the existing three season room. J. Burlce moved to grant Dominic Pannitte of 24149 Carla Lane their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a 3 season room and that the following variance is granted: 1. A 9 foot variance for a residence to close to the rear property line, (code requires 50', applicant shows 411), which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.08 (A)). J. Maloney seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. 4. Brian Itees; 3901 Woodside Drive: (WRD #2) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new fence and existing shed. The following variances are required: 1. A 24 foot variance for a fence within required 25' side yard setback, (code permits 0', applicant shows 1'), section (1135.02 (172)). 2. An 18 inch variance for a fence higher than code allows within required 25' side yard setbaclc), section (1135.02 (F1)). 3. A 14 foot variance for a shed located within required 25' side yard setback) (see note), code permits 0, applicant shows 11'), section (1135.02 (D1)). Note: Shed existed when homeowner purchased house. No record of permit ever being issued. Mr. Rees the owner came forward to be sworn in and address his request. Mr. Rees indicated that his home is located on a corner lot and he would like to install a 4-foot chain linlc fence around his yard. The variance required for the existing shed is due to a prior owner installing the shed without a permit. The shed was in place when he purchased the home and he is requesting the variance to be allowed to keep the shed. Mr. Burke questioned the area behind the applicants' home. Mr. Rees believed that the cul-de-sac would have 12 new homes and constntction would start some time in June. His neighbor has an existing chain-link fence that he would run his fence up to and place a space panel between the two fences. 3