06/29/2006 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

by placing a storage shed in lieu of a garage. Mr. Burlce advised that the character of the neighborhood was not conducive to a shed so large. Mr. Hogue reviewed that both his neighbors have double garages and all he is asking for is a shed. He tried to malce an appointment with the Building Commissioner and they came to his house instead. Mr. Maloney read aloud a letter from Ms. Hostaclcy reviewing what was said at the June 1" meeting and how the applicant referred to his proposed shed as a garage. She is against the request. Mr. Rymarczyk again advised that the applicant could constnict a garage without having to go before the board. This would include a hard stuface driveway. Mr. O'Malley advised that the applicant could resolve the issue by constructing a garage. J. 1Vlaloney moved to grant Linda Ann Hogue of 24261 Palm Drive their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a shed and that the following variance is granted: 1. A variance for a shed larger than code allows, (code permits 80 sq ft, 8' high, applicant shows 300 sq ft 12' high. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section; (1135.02 (D1)). J. Burke seconded the motion, which was unanimously denied. 3. Lldilco Kish; 3343 Walter Road: (WRD # 2) The proposal consists of a special permit to add to a non-conforming building (1165.02). The existing building is 46 feet from the right of way and code requires 50 feet. Ms. Kish the owner caine forward to be sworn in and address the request. Ms. Kish reviewed that she purchased the house a year earlier. She would lilce to place a front porch on the front of the house to improve the appearance. Ms. Sergi aslced if the porch would be in line with the garage. She felt that the porch would not create an adverse impact to the neighborhood, cause a nuisance, nor create traffic issues. No variances are required and the neighborhood would only benefit from the improvement of the home. Ms. Kish indicated that the porch would be even with the garage. Board members each voiced that they had no objections to the request. J. Burlce moved to grant I,ldilco Kish of 3343 Walter Road their request for a special permit to add to a non-conforming building (1165.02). The existing building is 46 feet from the right of wny and code requires 50 feet. M. Diver seconded the motion, which was unanimously npproved. Special Permit Granted 4. Eric Gilham; 27079 Butternut Ridge Road: (WRI) # 3) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new shed. The following variance is requested: l. A 5'/2 foot variance for storage shed higher than code allows, (code permits 10', applicant shows 15.5'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section; (1135.02 (D 1)). Note: Landinarlcs granted the applicant a certificate of appropriateness on 06-12-06. Mr. Gilham the owner came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. Maloney read aloud an e-mail from a Ms. Nelsen an abutting neighbor indicating she was un-able to attend the meeting. She is concerned with the size, height and location of the shed being requested. She also aslcs what would be stored in the garage and reviewed noise issues she has had with him in the past. Mr. Gilham reviewed that the building would be on the southwest side of the property and he had not had an outdoor pai-ty in a few years. The building is a pre-fabricated building and would be painted the saine color as his home. Mrs. Sergi voiced that she had an objection to the size of the shed due to the size of the lot however aslced if the height could be lowered. Mr. Gilham reviewed that he is constructing the shed to loolc lilce a barn. Mr. Rymarczylc reviewed that if the height of the shed is lowered it would alter the appearance of the shed and style which was approved by ? J