06/29/2006 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?landmarlcs. Mr. Burlce believed that due to the size of the lot and the fact that the yard is fenced the shed was warranted. M. Diver moved to grant Eric Gilham of 27079 Butternut Ridge Road his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a new shed and that the following variance is granted: 1. A 5'/Z foot variance for storage shed higher than code allows, (code perrrrits 10', applicant shows 15.5'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section; (1135.02 (D 1)). N. Sergi seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. 5. Francis Cool; 4627 Selhurst Road: (WRD # 1) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of an above ground pool. The following variance is requested: 1. A 189 square foot variance for above ground swimming pool, (code permits 1091 sq ft, applicant shows 1280 sq ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section; (1135.02 (d 2)). Ms. Meszaros the daughter of the owner, Mr. Cool the owner, Ms. Anita Cool, Ms. Khoury both daughters, Mr. Adainonis, and Ms. Merk neighbors each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Ms. Meszaros reviewed that she purchased the pool for her father. She tried to pull the permit September of 2005 and was told that she could not pull the permit the contractor would have to pull the perinit. She was only aware that the pool needed to be 5-feet from side yard and 10-feet from the baclc property line but not aware you could not cover more than 20% of the rear yard. The pool company finally applied for the permit however the pool was already delivered and is being stored until the permit was issued. Her father and sister both have debilitating health issues and needs the pool for exercising and the pool need to be sturdy. Mr. Cool reviewed that they had used a blowi.tp pool but it is not sturdy enough for either him or his daughter. Ms. Merlc advised that she has no objections to an above ground pool. Mr. Adamonis voiced that he had no objections to the pool and voiced that the neighbors would good neighbors and everyone in the neighborhood gets along. N. Sergi moved to grant Francis Cool of 4627 Selhurst Road his request for variance (1123.12), which consists of an above ground pool and the following variance is granted: 1. A 189 square foot variance for above ground swimming pool, (code permits 1091 sq ft, applicant shows 1280 sq ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section; (1135.02 (d 2)). M. Diver seconded tlae motion, which was unanimously approved. 6. Maryann Schultz; 4176 Laurell Lane: (WRI3 # 1) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a sunroom addition. The following variance is requested: 1. A 13 foot variance for a residence to close to the rear property line, (code requires 50', applicant shows 37"). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section; (1135.08 (A)). Ms. Kuzila the owner and Mr. Nigel the contractor each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. Nigel reviewed that his client would like a sunroom that would match the neighbor's suruoom. Mrs. Sergi asked if playground and plastic sheds were counted in rear yard coverage. Mr. Rymarczylc advised that playgrounds and plastic sheds are not calculated in the coverage allowance. Mr. Nigel advised that the sunroom would be 12' x 16' and be a three season room only. Part of the declc would be removed to install the sunroom. Board members voiced that they did not thinlc the variance was substantial. It would not affect governmental services. It would improve the character of the neighborhood and if the addition was any smaller it would not be feasible. Mr. Burlce believed that the suruoom would enhance the property value. 4