05/04/2006 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

12. A 67 foot variance for ground signs to close to each other, (code requires 200 ft, applicant shows 133 ft), section (1163.26 (a)). 13. A variance for A 2"d ground signs, (code permits 1, applicant shows 2), section (1163.26 (a)). _ rigHe i n a 9859nc ,. c-,... _ ',.,. a,. , , -. . _ __ , . Withdaawae at meeting not required . . , ? • , withdrawn at aaaeeting not required 16. A 3.8 foot variance for maxirnuffi foot candle illuYmination of parking lot, (code permits 4 fc max, applicant shows 6.8 fc), section (1161.12 (chart)). 17. A variance from section (1165.02 (d2). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1139.07), (1139.08), (1161.05 (r)), (1161.10 (b)), (1161.12 (c)), (1161.12 (d)), (1161.12 (e)), (1163.27 (a)), (1163.27 (c)), (1163.27 (d)), (1163.26 (a)), (1139.06) and (1161.12 (ehart)). Nate: On a comer Iocation 2 wall signs are pernutted providing second sign faces secondary fronta.ge street. MTr. Dugas the Project Manager came forwaxd to be svaorn in and address the recguest. Mr. Conway advised that variances 14 & 15 are not required however a varianee # 17 is required in accordance to chapter (1165.02 (d2)). Mr. O'Ma1ley advised that the non-confonning lot has a non-conforming building a.ud as it stands currently it is grandfathered. However due to the fact that the non- confornung structure is being reconsfiructed on the non-confoxming lot it requires a variance under section (1165.02 (d2)). Mr. Dugas advised that ttiey a.re in their first (1) year of a 20-year Iease and Taco Beil headquarters requires that their buildings be either upda.ted or rebuilt every 20 years. In order to meet ADA codes and other site requirements they have adjusted the location of the build'ang to the best of their ability. The front yard setback which is requared today vvould be located in the middle of the existing buiiding Iocation. The side yard setback is due to relocating the new buiiding close as possible to the existing footprint and the drive-thru lane creates the variance. A variance for 2 parking spaces is due to not having the ability to landbank parking due to the locaation of the underground detention systezn. They feel that as their grimary business is the drive-thru 19 parking spaces are adequate. T'here is not enough room on the Iot to accommodate an additionat 2 parking spaces. Variance request #5 is needed due to reading a 1.9 fc reading along the rear property line. Variance #7 the flight poles were lovvered to 18-feet with faall cut off fidares added which places the closest liglit to the residentaal property line now at 60-feet thereby eliminating variaaiee #7. Variance #9 is due to having two (2) wail signs on the same wall, #bey are allowed two wall signs as they are a comer lot with fronta.ge on two streets but they are required to be placed one on each fronta.ge. However they woanld like to have their logo (bell) and wording on the same wall. Variance # 10 is not required as the bell was changed to a 4-foot height as required by code. Mr. O'Malley suggested that if it is the intent of the appIicant to request permission to withdraw specific variances he should just specify which variances he would like to withdraw. Mx. Dugas stated lhat he would like to withdra.w the follovving variances: #5, #7, #10 and #16. The PDC arclutect requested that Variarnce #11 be sought as he liked the bell floating above the building. Vaa°iances #12 & #13 are due to ha.ving a grownd sign and a menu baard and the distance between them. Mr. O'Malley suggested that if variance #9 is granted it should be conditioned that no other wall signs be allowed on the building. J. IVYaloney moved to grant Taco Bell of 24247 Y.,orain gtoad their a°eeguest for variance (1123,12), vvhich consists of a new developffient and that the foHavvang variances are granted as apnended and agreed upon: 1. A 7 foot eariance for building front yaral setback, (codc requii°es 75 ftt, applicant shows 68 ft), sec4ion (1139.07). 10