|
2. A 29 foot variance for buildiiag sid.e yard setback, (code requires 50 ft, applicant shows 21
<br />ft), section (1139.08).
<br />3. A variance for 2 parkang spaces, (code reyuires 21, applicant shows 19), section (1161.05
<br />(r))•
<br />9. A variance for 1 additional wall signs, (code permits 2, applicant shows 2) (see note), section
<br />(1163.27 (a)). Conditioned upon no otber wall signs being anstalled on the bnilding.
<br />11. A 2 foot 6 inch variance for signs eacfending 1 ft 6 inches above the top of wall, (code
<br />requires 12 inches below, applicant show 1' 6" above), section (1163.27 (d)).
<br />12. A 67 foot variance for ground signs to close to each other, (cade requires 200 ft, applicant
<br />shows 133 ft), section ?1163.26 (a)).
<br />13. A variance for A 2° ground signs, (code permits 1, applicant shows 2), sectaon (1163.26
<br />(a))•
<br />17. A variance foc deviating €rom chapter (1165v02(d2). Wluch is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections: (1139.07), (1139.08), (1161.05 (r)), (1163.27 (a)),
<br />(1163.27 (d)) and (1163.26 (a)). T. Kelly seconded the motion, roli call on the motion; J.
<br />Maloney, T..Kelly yes to all, M. Diver, J. Burke yes to a11 bnt #11. Variance #11 Denieti and
<br />Variances # 1, 2, 3, 9,18,13 & 17 Granted as affiendecfl
<br />5. Fifth Third Bank; 28856/28890 Lorain Road: OM # 3)
<br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new development.
<br />The following variances are requested:
<br />?????&fiaM@???'
<br />. , . _ . Withdrawn At 1Vleeting
<br />. . ? • ,
<br />? •
<br />2 A '' f
<br />, .
<br />A A fi.t.. ..4 f.... fUl.
<br />> > rr
<br />? -
<br />5. A variance for lightung to be left on all night without reduction, (code requires 500/o Peduction,
<br />applicant shows none), section (1161.12 (d)). 6. A variance for 1 additional wall sign (night depository), (code permits l, applicant shows 2),
<br />section (1163.27 (a)). ,
<br />4:g4.s ....9e "'
<br />- , -
<br />" , . . ?Vithdrawn At lbieeting
<br />8. A variance for light trespassing over property line, (code requires 0 fc, applicanf shows .9),
<br />section (1161.12 (c))_
<br />Which is in violation of Ord, 90-125 sections (1161.12 (C)), (1161.12 (d)), (1163.27 (a)) and
<br />(1161.12 (1)).
<br />Mr. Weber the architect came forward to be sworn in and address the request. Mr. Weber reviewed
<br />the location of the new bank and that the two lots would be consolidated. The 6.8 foot candle
<br />variance is for the safety of vehicles using the ATM and night deposit box. The variance for leaving
<br />Iights on without reduciaig the wattage is also for the safety of clients using the night deposit box and
<br />AT1VI. The variance for two wa1l signs is due to the night deposit box sigra under the canopy. The 6
<br />inch variance for light base can be withdra.wn they wrill make sure 30 inch bases are used, so
<br />variance #7 is withdrawn. There will be futl cut off fixtures used and each Iight fixture will have
<br />house shields added to a11 rear light fixtures. The smali amount that wilI spill over wilI be onto a
<br />business lot which is not lit very well. Mr. Burke advrised that wMe revievving the Planning &
<br />Design Cpmmission minutes the commission was very admit about eliminating the need for light
<br />variances. He questioned if there was a way to decrease the amount af Iight under the canopy. Mr.
<br />iNeber reviewed Iighting laws which had not been adopted by Ohio but adopted in other states due to
<br />11
|