My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/12/2006 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2006
>
2006 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
01/12/2006 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:46:41 PM
Creation date
1/25/2019 4:48:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2006
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/12/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
`• 1 unit indicated E-2b - 40.1 square feet • 10 units indicated E-2 - 40 square feet less <br />less than allowed than allowed <br />Note: (2) 1). 1 pole 75', 1 pole 95' and 1 pole 105' requiring variances of 40', 20', & 10'. No indication <br />of degree of cut-off provided therefore an 85 degree was used to base these figures. (Write-up is based <br />on plans received 12/13/05). Per plans received 1/06/06 variance requests remain as written. <br />Michael Gareau Sr., Mr. P. Gareau, with Catholic Charity, Mr. Berardi applicants Architect, Mr. <br />Newberry Project Engineer, Mr. Murtaugh, the Developer, Mr. Hendershott Architect and <br />Councilwoman Nicole Daily-Jones, each came forward to be sworn in and address the request. <br />Applicants presentation; <br />Mr. Gareau Sr. reviewed that North Olmsted had been loolcing at bringing independent and assisted <br />living housing to North Olmsted for many years and is still in the process of establishing guidelines for <br />that type of housing. The applicants have brought their experts to answer the board members questions. <br />Mr. Newberry reviewed that Planning Commission requested the area variances be granted as the <br />building was moved to accommodate the Metroparlcs deed restriction and move the west entrance <br />further away from the west side neighbors home. Code requires one parking space for each unit built as <br />well as one for each employee which will be 20, thereby requiring 150 parking spaces. Current plans <br />show 28 landbanlced parlcing spaces which Planning Commission approved and 112 actual striped <br />parking spaces totaling 140 parking spaces which leave the site 10 parking spaces short. 30 of the units <br />will be assisted living units and past practice has taught them that the assisted living tenants no longer <br />drive and for the most part the independent tenants that can drive will depend on public transpiration and <br />the facilities vans. Variances dealing with lighting issues are hereby withdrawn as it is their intent to <br />meet all city code requirements pertaining to lighting requirements. They will submit new lighting plans <br />meeting all code requirements. <br />Mr. Berardi the project architect indicated that he was present to discuss the sizes of the proposed <br />assisted living units. Out of the proposed 130 units there will be 30 assisted living units which require <br />variances for minimum square footage. The City is currently addressing legislation to change the <br />minimum square footage for assisted living units from 400 square feet to 350 square feet or less. If the <br />city requires assisted living units to have a minimum of 350 square feet then only 8 of the proposed units <br />would require variances. He advised that there were no State restrictions for square footage of assisted <br />living units. State code licenses dealing with assisted living units are listed under nursing home <br />requirements, which require 80 square feet per bed or a room to be 150 square feet, which is less than <br />what they are proposing. He suggested that the proposed square footage of the units are standard sizes <br />for their use. The buildings are designed around the income of the surrounding population. It is their <br />goal to stay within an affordable range of the area when constructing the units. Assisted living units are <br />designed to encourage the tenants to leave their rooms to utilize the public areas. Public space for <br />socialization makes up 43% of the building and the remaining 57% is living area which is beyond what <br />State code requires. <br />Mr. Pat Gareau reviewed that he had worked in the area of developing and operating nursing and <br />assisted living homes for the past 20 years. The sizes of assisted living units are determined by the <br />individual area market. The labor intensive nature of assisted living is what drives the price of the units <br />up. The proposed assisted living units will provide laundry service, 3 square meals, housekeeping, <br />medication assistance, bathing assistance and 24 hour nurses. The proposed unit sizes are not <br />uncommon to the area and their studies have shown that there is a need for units of this size for <br />affordability. It would be a practical difficulty to increase the sizes of the assisted living units and then <br />to try to fit it in their marketing or financial plan. They are a non-profit organization and receive no <br />government assistances or grants so any costs they incur are passed on through rental rates. In a study <br />conducted by the Volunteers of America and Harvard studies released in 2003, out of the 50 States 43 <br />States have minimum square footage requirements of 70 square feet and a maximum square foot <br />2of11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.