07/11/2007 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

land would not be used. There should be no access to the site from Mastick as the traffic volume would be too much for the road. Mr. Cotner questioned if in fact there was intent to seek an access point for parcel A when and if it is developed. Mr. Meserini said at this point there are no plans for parcel A. Mr... Wasmer, and Mr. Casedonte, residents of Mastick Road said they were against Mastick Road being used as access for the site. Mr. Wasmer said the existing ground sign although he has been told it meets city codes, blocks the view of traffic leaving the site and poses a safety risk. He believes that sign and vacant lot with overgrown weeds needs to be addressed. Mr. Lasko suggested contacting the building department to address property maintenance. Mr. Meserini said he did not understand why a cross easement was needed or why access to Mastick should be prohibited as a condition. Any future development would need to be approved by the Commission and access would be addressed at that time. He questioned if the commission was saying that the Mastick Road site could never be used as an access point to parcel A. Mr. Lasko explained that the access requirements were to ensure that if at a later date tlie applicant wanted to develop or add additional property to the site it would then be required to go before the commission for review including access from Mastick Road. J: L`asko moved to approve the lot split and consolidation plat for Wellington Place of 4800 Clague Road, a proposal to split a parcel off of permanent parcel numbers 237-21-001, 237-21-010 and 237-23-068 (approximately 7.08 acres) (parcel A) and to consolida'te the split portion with permanent parcel number 237-23-033 (approximately 5.08 acres) (parcel B). The remaining parcel A will be 7.5440 acres. The consolidated parcel B will be 6.1514 acres. The location is on the southwest corner of Brookpark Rd. and Clague Rd. The portions of parcels A and B are zoned Residence, Multiple. The southern portions are zoned, A, Residence, Single. Parcel B was developed in accordance with the former zoning provisions of the Senior Residence District. The following conditions are applied: 1. An access easeynent is required from parcel B to parcel A for cross access through parcel B. 2. There is to be no ingress or egress from Mastick Road. Both conditions are to be noted on tlie plat prior to the plat being recorded. G. Malone seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. Mr.'Nickel said the plans show no access and placing the condition to not use Mastick restricts any future development plans. Mr. Lasko advised that the commission placed the condition to ensure any future issues would be required to go before them. The applicants stated they did not believe they should be restricted. Mr. O'Malley said that the lot that is being created could be sold and that owner could come to the city and say the county will not let me have access to Brookpark and Wellington will not let me have access to Clague Road therefore based on the fact the city created the lot the owner has a right to have access on Mastick Road. Creating the easerrient and restrictions now on this plat when the parcel is being created protects the city. V. OLD BUSINESS: 1. Crocker Stearns Corridor Plan: (WRD # 3) Redevelopment plan and design strategy for the Crocker Stearns corridor. Note: PDC tabled 06%27/07 1VIs. , Wenger reviewed that the 2005 Master Plan recommended creating an action plan for the Crocker Stearns corridor to address the changes resulting from the roadway project. Several meetings were held with the Urban Design Center and the community to determine the best 2