Laserfiche WebLink
property needs three wall signs. The variance is substantial but warranted. Mr. Menser did not <br />believe the character of neighborhood would not be altered. Mrs. Diver reviewed that <br />goverrimental services would not be altered and the owner has knowledge of the city codes. All <br />board members felt the spirit and intent of the code would be served granting the variance for 2 <br />additional wall signs. <br />R. Menser moved to approve Key Bank of 26380 Great Northern shopping center their <br />request for variance (1123.12), which consists of new signs and the following variances are <br />granted as amended: 1). A varianee for 2 adclitional wall signs on a building, (code permits 1 <br />applicant shows 3), section (1163.27 (a))o The total square footage of signage on the building <br />will be 96 sq ft. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections; (1163.27 (a)) and (1163.24 (b)). <br />N. Sergi seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. <br />4. Randall House Properties; 4701-4763 Great Northern Blvd: (WRD #4) <br />Applicant request notice of appeal from the Building Commissioners determination dated Apri126, <br />2007 ordering the south end installed bollards removed and to install curbing and grass area per <br />original development plans, (per section (1123.07)). <br />Mr. Grendell the applicant's attorney came forward and prior to being sworn in said he wished to <br />address a procedure issue. His client received a letter dated July 25, 2007 from the board's clerlc <br />advising his client that the case was anticipated for the September meeting and they had until <br />August 23, to submit their application, payment and documents. Then two days later his client <br />received an agenda and copy of the legal notice showing they were on the August 2°a, docket. He <br />and liis clients are present as a courtesy but can not present their case as they haven't been given an <br />opportunity to submit their documents and ask the board to allow them to be placed on the <br />September 6th meeting doclcet. <br />Mr. O'1Vlalley reviewed why the applicant received both letters and advised the board to allow the <br />applicants request to be tabled to provide the applicant ample time to make application, pay the <br />required fees and submit their brief. In fact if the applicants require more time than the September <br />meeting date there is no violation of any code or procedure if the board chooses to grant them even <br />inore time. Mr. Grendell said he understood the city was acting on good faith and they respectfully <br />request to be tabled until the September meeting. Mrs. Diver apologized for the applicants having <br />to sit through the entire meeting to request to be tabled. <br />N. Sergi moved to table Randall House Properties of 4701-4763 Great Northern Blvd their <br />request for an appeal from the Building Commissioners determination dated Apri126, 2007 <br />until the Septemlber 6`h, BZA meeting. M. Diver seconded the anotion which was <br />unanimously approved. <br />V. COMMUNICATIONS: <br />The.clerk was asked to report to the board at their September meeting on their request to be <br />provided ID's or business cards so they can provide homeowners identification for being on their <br />property for the city. <br />Mrs. IDiver said that she was made aware that there may be a conflict of timing in receiving <br />paclcets and having enough time to visit the sites. The board members packets were mailed out <br />this month and most of the members received their packets 3 days before the meeting which does <br />not allow them enough time to visit each site. She and Mrs. Sergi contacted other cities to find out <br />8